Telemanipulator for Remote Minimally Invasive Surgery Requirements for a Light-Weight Robot for Both Open and Laparoscopic Surgery

I n minimally invasive surgery (MIS), the surgeon works with long instruments through small incisions. These small incisions are the main advantage of MIS, leading to several benefits for the patient when compared with open surgery. These benefits include reduced pain and trauma, reduced loss of blood, reduced risk of wound infections, shorter hospital stays, shorter rehabilitation time, and cosmetic advantages. In contrast to open surgery, direct access to the operation field is no longer possible for the surgeon. According to [1], the loss of direct access leads to several drawbacks for the surgeon: 1) Tissue cannot be palpated any more. 2) Because of the relatively high friction in the trocar, the contact forces between instrument and tissue can hardly be sensed. [The trocar is a surgical device, which makes it possible to create incisions in a visceral cavity (i.e. thorax, abdominal cavity) and keeps it open with the aid of a tube.] This is especially the case when the trocar is placed in the narrow intercostal space (i.e., space between the ribs). 3) As the instruments have to be moved around an invariant fulcrum point, intuitive direct hand–eye coordination is lost, and because of the kinematic restrictions, only 4 degrees of freedom (DoF) remain inside the body of the patient. Therefore, the surgeon cannot reach any point in the work space at an arbitrary orientation. This is a main drawback of MIS, which makes complex tasks like knot tying very time consuming and require intensive training [2]. To overcome the aforementioned drawbacks, telesurgery systems are a promising approach (Figure 1). Within these systems, telemanipulators are key components, as they transfer the surgeon’s commands into the patient’s body. In combination with appropriate display and telepresence technologies, they allow for a high-grade immersion of the surgeon into the remote site, thus regaining virtually direct access to the operation area comparable to open surgery. The following properties of minimally invasive robotic surgery (MIRS) can be realized with appropriate technologies: 1) Manipulation forces can be measured by miniaturized sensors integrated in the instruments (e.g., see [3]). It is to be expected that the surgeon’s situational awareness is increased if the contact situation is displayed to the surgeon by suitable man–machine interfaces (MMIs). 2) By means of control algorithms and actuated surgical instruments, the correct

[1]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Limitations for manual and telemanipulator-assisted motion tracking--implications for endoscopic beating-heart surgery. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  Motion Compensation in Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery , 2003 .

[3]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  A soft robotics approach for navigated pedicle screw placement First experimental results , 2006 .

[4]  H Feussner,et al.  An innovative, safe and sterile sigmoid access (ISSA) for NOTES. , 2007, Endoscopy.

[5]  Bernhard Kübler,et al.  Development of actuated and sensor integrated forceps for minimally invasive robotic surgery , 2006 .

[6]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  Kinematic Design Optimization of an Actuated Carrier for the DLR Multi-Arm Surgical System , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The DLR MIRO: a versatile lightweight robot for surgical applications , 2008, Ind. Robot.

[8]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  Manipulability and Accuracy Measures for a Medical Robot in Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2004 .

[9]  Yuling Yan,et al.  All singularities of the 9-DOF DLR medical robot setup for minimally invasive applications , 2006, ARK.

[10]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Force-Feedback Surgical Teleoperator: Controller Design and Palpation Experiments , 2008, 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[11]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  A hands-on-robot for accurate placement of pedicle screws , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[12]  Yuki Kobayashi,et al.  Small Occupancy Robotic Mechanisms for Endoscopic Surgery , 2002, MICCAI.

[13]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  MIMO State Feedback Controller for a Flexible Joint Robot with Strong Joint Coupling , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Bernhard Kübler,et al.  Prototype of Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery with 6-Axis Force Sensing Capability , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Christopher R. Wagner,et al.  The role of force feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[16]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  On a new generation of torque controlled light-weight robots , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[17]  Luc Soler,et al.  Beating heart tracking in robotic surgery using 500 Hz visual servoing, model predictive control and an adaptive observer , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[18]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  A Force Controlled Laparoscopic Surgical Robot without Distal Force Sensing , 2004, ISER.

[19]  Jaydev P. Desai,et al.  Real-Time Haptic Feedback in Laparoscopic Tools for Use in Gastro-Intestinal Surgery , 2002, MICCAI.

[20]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[21]  Phillip J. McKerrow,et al.  Introduction to robotics , 1991 .

[22]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Optimal Design of a Medical Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2003 .

[23]  V. Falk,et al.  Robotic coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)--the Leipzig experience. , 2003, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[24]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[25]  T. Ortmaier,et al.  Aufbauoptimierung für Roboter in medizinischen Anwendungen , 2002 .

[26]  Shigeyuki Shimachi,et al.  Adapter for contact force sensing of the da Vinci® robot , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[27]  Brian L. Davies,et al.  Preliminary Results of an Early Clinical Experience with the AcrobotTM System for Total Knee Replacement Surgery , 2002, MICCAI.

[28]  D. Rattner,et al.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[29]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  Real time visual servoing for laparoscopic surgery. , 1997 .

[30]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  Cartesian Control of Robots with Working-Position Dependent Dynamics , 2000 .

[31]  Massimo Sorli,et al.  Six-axis reticulated structure force/torque sensor with adaptable performances , 1995 .