Do muscle synergies reduce the dimensionality of behavior?

The muscle synergy hypothesis is an archetype of the notion of Dimensionality Reduction (DR) occurring in the central nervous system due to modular organization. Toward validating this hypothesis, it is important to understand if muscle synergies can reduce the state-space dimensionality while maintaining task control. In this paper we present a scheme for investigating this reduction utilizing the temporal muscle synergy formulation. Our approach is based on the observation that constraining the control input to a weighted combination of temporal muscle synergies also constrains the dynamic behavior of a system in a trajectory-specific manner. We compute this constrained reformulation of system dynamics and then use the method of system balancing for quantifying the DR; we term this approach as Trajectory Specific Dimensionality Analysis (TSDA). We then investigate the consequence of minimization of the dimensionality for a given task. These methods are tested in simulations on a linear (tethered mass) and a non-linear (compliant kinematic chain) system. Dimensionality of various reaching trajectories is compared when using idealized temporal synergies. We show that as a consequence of this Minimum Dimensional Control (MDC) model, smooth straight-line Cartesian trajectories with bell-shaped velocity profiles emerged as the optima for the reaching task. We also investigated the effect on dimensionality due to adding via-points to a trajectory. The results indicate that a trajectory and synergy basis specific DR of behavior results from muscle synergy control. The implications of these results for the synergy hypothesis, optimal motor control, motor development, and robotics are discussed.

[1]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[2]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[3]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  Linear Homeomorphic Model for Human Movement , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  B. Moore Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction , 1981 .

[5]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[6]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Laub,et al.  Computation of system balancing transformations and other applications of simultaneous diagonalization algorithms , 1987 .

[9]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Robot dynamics and control , 1989 .

[10]  B. Vereijken,et al.  Free(z)ing Degrees of Freedom in Skill Acquisition , 1992 .

[11]  G. Edelman,et al.  Solving Bernstein's problem: a proposal for the development of coordinated movement by selection. , 1993, Child development.

[12]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[13]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[15]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[17]  C. Harris The Fourier analysis of biological transients , 1998, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  C. Harris On the optimal control of behaviour: a stochastic perspective , 1998, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  N. Berthier,et al.  Proximodistal structure of early reaching in human infants , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  J Porrill,et al.  Optimality of position commands to horizontal eye muscles: A test of the minimum-norm rule. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Y Uno,et al.  Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  D. Sorensen,et al.  A Survey of Model Reduction Methods for Large-Scale Systems , 2000 .

[25]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Marsden,et al.  A subspace approach to balanced truncation for model reduction of nonlinear control systems , 2002 .

[27]  Thomas F. Edgar,et al.  An improved method for nonlinear model reduction using balancing of empirical gramians , 2002 .

[28]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Temporal components of the motor patterns expressed by the human spinal cord reflect foot kinematics. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  A Developmental Approach Aids Motor Learning , 2003, Neural Computation.

[31]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  Christopher M Harris Exploring smoothness and discontinuities in human motor behaviour with Fourier analysis. , 2004, Mathematical biosciences.

[35]  S. Giszter,et al.  Modular Premotor Drives and Unit Bursts as Primitives for Frog Motor Behaviors , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  A. Antoulas,et al.  A Survey of Model Reduction by Balanced Truncation and Some New Results , 2004 .

[37]  Lena H Ting,et al.  A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[39]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Coordination of Locomotion with Voluntary Movements in Humans , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Motor primitives in vertebrates and invertebrates , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Juergen Hahn,et al.  Reduction of stable differential–algebraic equation systems via projections and system identification , 2005 .

[43]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Motor Control Programs and Walking , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[44]  Andrea d'Avella,et al.  Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Motor patterns in human walking and running. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  An interior algorithm for nonlinear optimization that combines line search and trust region steps , 2006, Math. Program..

[47]  Lena H Ting,et al.  Dimensional reduction in sensorimotor systems: a framework for understanding muscle coordination of posture. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[48]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: A review , 2008, Neural Networks.

[49]  Amir Karniel,et al.  Minimum Acceleration Criterion with Constraints Implies Bang-Bang Control as an Underlying Principle for Optimal Trajectories of Arm Reaching Movements , 2008, Neural Computation.

[50]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Motor Adaptation as a Process of Reoptimization , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  2008 Special Issue: Reinforcement learning of motor skills with policy gradients , 2008 .

[52]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Modular control of human walking: a simulation study. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[53]  Christopher M Harris,et al.  Biomimetics of human movement: functional or aesthetic? , 2009, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[54]  M. Tresch,et al.  The case for and against muscle synergies , 2022 .

[55]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Motor Task Variation Induces Structural Learning , 2009, Current Biology.

[56]  Anthony Jarc,et al.  Simplified and effective motor control based on muscle synergies to exploit musculoskeletal dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  A Generalized Path Integral Control Approach to Reinforcement Learning , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[58]  A. d’Avella,et al.  Locomotor Primitives in Newborn Babies and Their Development , 2011, Science.

[59]  C. Harris Oculomotor developmental pathology: an ‘evo-devo’ perspective , 2011 .

[60]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Principles of sensorimotor learning , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[61]  Andrea d'Avella,et al.  Synthesis and Adaptation of Effective Motor Synergies for the Solution of Reaching Tasks , 2012, SAB.

[62]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  Synthesising a Motor-Primitive Inspired Control Architecture for Redundant Compliant Robots , 2012, SAB.

[63]  Francisco J. Valero Cuevas,et al.  Challenges and New Approaches to Proving the Existence of Muscle Synergies of Neural Origin , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[64]  Lena H. Ting,et al.  Optimization of Muscle Activity for Task-Level Goals Predicts Complex Changes in Limb Forces across Biomechanical Contexts , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[65]  Aymar de Rugy,et al.  Are muscle synergies useful for neural control? , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[66]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Muscle synergies in neuroscience and robotics: from input-space to task-space perspectives , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[67]  Jan Peters,et al.  Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[68]  Jun Nakanishi,et al.  Dynamical Movement Primitives: Learning Attractor Models for Motor Behaviors , 2013, Neural Computation.

[69]  Matthew C. Tresch,et al.  The number and choice of muscles impact the results of muscle synergy analyses , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[70]  Amir Karniel,et al.  The minimum transition hypothesis for intermittent hierarchical motor control , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[71]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Investigating reduction of dimensionality during single-joint elbow movements: a case study on muscle synergies , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[72]  Naveen Kuppuswamy,et al.  Developing learnability — The case for reduced dimensionality , 2013, 2013 IEEE Third Joint International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL).