Learning to Order Objects Using Haptic and Proprioceptive Exploratory Behaviors

This paper proposes a novel framework that enables a robot to learn ordinal object relations. While most related work focuses on classifying objects into discrete categories, such approaches cannot learn object properties (e.g., weight, height, size, etc.) that are context-specific and relative to other objects. To address this problem, we propose that a robot should learn to order objects based on ordinal object relations. In our experiments, the robot explored a set of 32 objects that can be ordered by three properties: height, weight, and width. Next, the robot used unsupervised learning to discover multiple ways that the objects can be ordered based on the haptic and proprioceptive perceptions detected while exploring the objects. Following, the robot's model was presented with labeled object series, allowing it to ground the three ordinal relations in terms of how similar they are to the orders discovered during the unsupervised stage. Finally, the grounded models were used to recognize whether new object series were ordered by any of the three properties as well as to correctly insert additional objects into an existing series.

[1]  O. Bagasra,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1914, Science.

[2]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Call for Papers: “Behavioral Economics and Economic Psychology” - A Special Issue of the Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology , 2008 .

[3]  S. Gelman,et al.  Children's use of context in interpreting "big" and "little". , 1994, Child development.

[4]  L. Smith,et al.  What is "high"? The development of reference points for "high" and "low". , 1986, Child development.

[5]  Ian Witten,et al.  Data Mining , 2000 .

[6]  L. J. Friedman Child Development , 1971, Nature.

[7]  Sinan Kalkan,et al.  Co-learning nouns and adjectives , 2013, 2013 IEEE Third Joint International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL).

[8]  Sinan Kalkan,et al.  The learning of adjectives and nouns from affordance and appearance features , 2013, Adapt. Behav..

[9]  Anna Gorbenko,et al.  Self-Learning Algorithm for Visual Recognition and Object Categorization for Autonomous Mobile Robots , 2012 .

[10]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Robotic learning of haptic adjectives through physical interaction , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  Charles Kemp,et al.  The discovery of structural form , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Johannes Kingma,et al.  The Construction of a Developmental Scale for Seriation , 1984 .

[13]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  A sensorimotor account of visual and tactile integration for object categorization and grasping , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  S. Gelman,et al.  Coordination of size standards by young children. , 1988, Child development.

[15]  Danica Kragic,et al.  Interactive object classification using sensorimotor contingencies , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[16]  Tie-Yan Liu,et al.  Learning to rank for information retrieval , 2009, SIGIR.

[17]  S. Sugarman The cognitive basis of classification in very young children: an analysis of object-ordering trends. , 1981, Child development.

[18]  Peter Stone,et al.  Learning Multi-Modal Grounded Linguistic Semantics by Playing "I Spy" , 2016, IJCAI.

[19]  Connor Schenck,et al.  Learning relational object categories using behavioral exploration and multimodal perception , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[20]  Jean-Arcady Meyer,et al.  Adaptive Behavior , 2005 .

[21]  Sinan Kalkan,et al.  A Probabilistic Concept Web on a Humanoid Robot , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[22]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[23]  F. Graham,et al.  Learning of relative and absolute size concepts in preschool children , 1964 .

[24]  Dieter Fox,et al.  A large-scale hierarchical multi-view RGB-D object dataset , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[25]  Tomoaki Nakamura,et al.  Mutual learning of an object concept and language model based on MLDA and NPYLM , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[26]  Connor Schenck,et al.  Grounding semantic categories in behavioral interactions: Experiments with 100 objects , 2014, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[27]  J. Dixon,et al.  Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 2001 .

[28]  Connor Schenck,et al.  Which Object Comes Next? Grounded Order Completion by a Humanoid Robot , 2012 .

[29]  P. H. Arx,et al.  Assessing Intellectual Giftedness with the WISC-IV and the IDS , 2008 .

[30]  Pieter Reitsma,et al.  Educational and Psychological Measurement , 2003 .