Using domain-general principles to explain children's causal reasoning abilities.

A connectionist model of causal attribution is presented, emphasizing the use of domain-general principles of processing and learning previously employed in models of semantic cognition. The model categorizes objects dependent upon their observed 'causal properties' and is capable of making several types of inferences that 4-year-old children have been shown to be capable of. The model gives rise to approximate conformity to normative models of causal inference and gives approximate estimates of the probability that an object presented in an ambiguous situation actually possesses a particular causal power, based on background knowledge and recent observations. It accounts for data from three sets of experimental studies of the causal inferencing abilities of young children. The model provides a base for further efforts to delineate the intuitive mechanisms of causal inference employed by children and adults, without appealing to inherent principles or mechanisms specialized for causal as opposed to other forms of reasoning.

[1]  N. Schmajuk,et al.  Experimental challenges to theories of classical conditioning: application of an attentional model of storage and retrieval. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .

[3]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Causal learning across domains. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[4]  David M. Sobel,et al.  A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets. , 2004, Psychological review.

[5]  D. Sobel Running head: CHILDREN’S CAUSAL INFERENCES Children’s causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers , 2003 .

[6]  Alison Gopnik,et al.  Inferring Hidden Causes , 2003 .

[7]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[8]  M. Minami How Children Learn the Meanings of Words , 2001 .

[9]  Nathaniel J. Blair,et al.  Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Detecting blickets: how young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. , 2000, Child development.

[11]  D. Plaut,et al.  Does generalization in infant learning implicate abstract algebra-like rules? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  T. Rohde LENS : The light , efficient network simulator , 1999 .

[13]  Hh Bülthoff,et al.  A Bayesian framework for the integration of visual modules , 1996 .

[14]  Randall C. O'Reilly,et al.  Biologically Plausible Error-Driven Learning Using Local Activation Differences: The Generalized Recirculation Algorithm , 1996, Neural Computation.

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[16]  James L. McClelland Integration of information: Reflections on the theme of attention and performance XVI , 1996 .

[17]  Alan L. YuilleDivision A Bayesian Framework for the Integration of Visual Modules , 1996 .

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade‐off , 1994, Hippocampus.

[20]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements , 1994 .

[21]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Object Recognition and Sensitive Periods: A Computational Analysis of Visual Imprinting , 1994, Neural Computation.

[22]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[23]  A. Gopnik,et al.  The theory theory. , 1994 .

[24]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Learning and connectionist representations , 1993 .

[25]  Peter Földiák,et al.  Learning Invariance from Transformation Sequences , 1991, Neural Comput..

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[27]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Ronald J. Williams,et al.  A Learning Algorithm for Continually Running Fully Recurrent Neural Networks , 1989, Neural Computation.

[29]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning Representations by Recirculation , 1987, NIPS.

[31]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[32]  James L. McClelland The programmable blackboard model of reading , 1986 .

[33]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed model of human learning and memory , 1986 .

[34]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models , 1986 .

[35]  Mozer,et al.  Early parallel processing in reading: a connectionist approach. Technical report, April-November 1986 , 1986 .

[36]  G. Miller,et al.  Linguistic theory and psychological reality , 1982 .

[37]  T. Shultz Rules of Causal Attribution. , 1982 .

[38]  S. Carey The child as word learner , 1978 .

[39]  Illtyd Trethowan Causality , 1938 .

[40]  J. Piaget The Child's Conception of Physical Causality , 1927 .