Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade‐off

The hippocampus and related structures are thought to be capable of (1) representing cortical activity in a way that minimizes overlap of the representations assigned to different cortical patterns (pattern separation); and (2) modifying synaptic connections so that these representations can later be reinstated from partial or noisy versions of the cortical activity pattern that was present at the time of storage (pattern completion). We point out that there is a trade‐off between pattern separation and completion and propose that the unique anatomical and physiological properties of the hippocampus might serve to minimize this trade‐off. We use analytical methods to determine quantitative estimates of both separation and completion for specified parameterized models of the hippocampus. These estimates are then used to evaluate the role of various properties and of the hippocampus, such as the activity levels seen in different hippocampal regions, synaptic potentiation and depression, the multi‐layer connectivity of the system, and the relatively focused and strong mossy fiber projections. This analysis is focused on the feedforward pathways from the entorhinal cortex (EC) to the dentate gyrus (DG) and region CA3. Among our results are the following: (1) Hebbian synaptic modification (LTP) facilitates completion but reduces separation, unless the strengths of synapses from inactive presynaptic units to active postsynaptic units are reduced (LTD). (2) Multiple layers, as in EC to DG to CA3, allow the compounding of pattern separation, but not pattern completion. (3) The variance of the input signal carried by the mossy fibers is important for separation, not the raw strength, which may explain why the mossy fiber inputs are few and relatively strong, rather than many and relatively weak like the other hippocampal pathways. (4) The EC projects to CA3 both directly and indirectly via the DG, which suggests that the two‐stage pathway may dominate during pattern separation and the one‐stage pathway may dominate during completion; methods the hippocampus may use to enhance this effect are discussed. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  D. Marr A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  D. Marr A theory for cerebral neocortex , 1970, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  D Marr,et al.  Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  T. Bliss,et al.  Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  D. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. I. Temporal lobe afferents , 1975, Brain Research.

[6]  Deepak N. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. III. Efferent connections , 1975, Brain Research.

[7]  Deepak N. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. II. Frontal lobe afferents , 1975, Brain Research.

[8]  W. Precht The synaptic organization of the brain G.M. Shepherd, Oxford University Press (1975). 364 pp., £3.80 (paperback) , 1976, Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Shepherd The Synaptic Organization of the Brain , 1979 .

[10]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Chunking and consolidation: A theoretical synthesis of semantic networks configuring in conditioning , 1979 .

[11]  Thomas H. Brown,et al.  Spontaneous miniature synaptic potentials in hippocampal neurons , 1979, Brain Research.

[12]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  G. V. Hoesen,et al.  The parahippocampal gyrus: New observations regarding its cortical connections in the monkey , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  T. H. Brown,et al.  Voltage-clamp analysis of mossy fiber synaptic input to hippocampal neurons. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  W. Cowan,et al.  On the number of neurons in the dentate gyrus of the rat , 1985, Brain Research.

[17]  T. H. Brown,et al.  Conductance mechanism responsible for long-term potentiation in monosynaptic and isolated excitatory synaptic inputs to hippocampus. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  T. Teyler,et al.  The hippocampal memory indexing theory. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[19]  T. Teyler,et al.  The hippocampal memory indexing theory. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  C. Cotman,et al.  Long-term potentiation of guinea pig mossy fiber responses is not blocked by N-methyl d-aspartate antagonists , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  D. Amaral,et al.  A light and electron microscopic analysis of the mossy fibers of the rat dentate gyrus , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  D. Amaral,et al.  The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: II. Cortical afferents , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  W. Cowan,et al.  On the numbers of neurons on fields CA1 and CA3 of the hippocampus of Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats , 1987, Brain Research.

[24]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  Sompolinsky,et al.  Information storage in neural networks with low levels of activity. , 1987, Physical review. A, General physics.

[26]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .

[27]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia , 1989, Psychobiology.

[28]  D. Amaral,et al.  Memory and the Hippocampus , 1989 .

[29]  E. Rolls Functions of neuronal networks in the hippocampus and neocortex in memory , 1989 .

[30]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks. , 1989 .

[31]  John H. Byrne,et al.  Neural Models of Plasticity: Experimental and Theoretical Approaches , 1989 .

[32]  Antonio R. Damasio,et al.  The Brain Binds Entities and Events by Multiregional Activation from Convergence Zones , 1989, Neural Computation.

[33]  D. Amaral,et al.  Neurons, numbers and the hippocampal network. , 1990, Progress in brain research.

[34]  E. W. Kairiss,et al.  Hebbian synapses: biophysical mechanisms and algorithms. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Comparison of spatial and temporal characteristics of neuronal activity in sequential stages of hippocampal processing. , 1990, Progress in brain research.

[36]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Hebb-Marr networks and the neurobiological representation of action in space. , 1990 .

[37]  E. Rolls Principles underlying the representation and storage of information in neuronal networks in the primate hippocampus and cerebral cortex , 1990 .

[38]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  What determines the capacity of autoassociative memories in the brain? Network , 1991 .

[39]  Max R. Bennett,et al.  Probabilistic secretion of quanta in the central nervous system: granule cell synaptic control of pattern separation and activity regulation. , 1991, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[40]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[41]  N. Schmajuk,et al.  Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning, and hippocampal function. , 1992, Psychological review.

[42]  E T Rolls,et al.  Computational constraints suggest the need for two distinct input systems to the hippocampal CA3 network , 1992, Hippocampus.

[43]  John Robinson,et al.  Statistical analysis of the dynamics of a sparse associative memory , 1992, Neural Networks.

[44]  M. Gluck,et al.  Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory , 1993, Hippocampus.

[45]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Dynamics of the hippocampal ensemble code for space. , 1993, Science.

[46]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The organization of memory. A parallel distributed processing perspective. , 1994, Revue neurologique.

[47]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.