Pattern Separation in the Dentate Gyrus and CA3 of the Hippocampus

Theoretical models have long pointed to the dentate gyrus as a possible source of neuronal pattern separation. In agreement with predictions from these models, we show that minimal changes in the shape of the environment in which rats are exploring can substantially alter correlated activity patterns among place-modulated granule cells in the dentate gyrus. When the environments are made more different, new cell populations are recruited in CA3 but not in the dentate gyrus. These results imply a dual mechanism for pattern separation in which signals from the entorhinal cortex can be decorrelated both by changes in coincidence patterns in the dentate gyrus and by recruitment of nonoverlapping cell assemblies in CA3.

[1]  D. Marr.  A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  D Marr,et al.  Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  J. O'Keefe,et al.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. , 1971, Brain research.

[4]  J. Albus.  A Theory of Cerebellar Function , 1971 .

[5]  W. Cowan,et al.  On the number of neurons in the dentate gyrus of the rat , 1985, Brain Research.

[6]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Spatial firing patterns of hippocampal complex-spike cells in a fixed environment , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Muller,et al.  The effects of changes in the environment on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Amaral,et al.  Neurons, numbers and the hippocampal network. , 1990, Progress in brain research.

[9]  R. Muller,et al.  The firing of hippocampal place cells in the dark depends on the rat's recent experience , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  E. Bostock,et al.  Experience‐dependent modifications of hippocampal place cell firing , 1991, Hippocampus.

[11]  E T Rolls,et al.  Computational constraints suggest the need for two distinct input systems to the hippocampal CA3 network , 1992, Hippocampus.

[12]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Spatial selectivity of unit activity in the hippocampal granular layer , 1993, Hippocampus.

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade‐off , 1994, Hippocampus.

[14]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  Dynamics of learning and recall at excitatory recurrent synapses and cholinergic modulation in rat hippocampal region CA3 , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  W E Skaggs,et al.  Interactions between location and task affect the spatial and directional firing of hippocampal neurons , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  M Tsodyks,et al.  Attractor neural network models of spatial maps in hippocampus , 1999, Hippocampus.

[17]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[18]  Paul E. Gilbert,et al.  Dissociating hippocampal subregions: A double dissociation between dentate gyrus and CA1 , 2001, Hippocampus.

[19]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Single granule cells reliably discharge targets in the hippocampal CA3 network in vivo , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Quirk,et al.  Requirement for Hippocampal CA3 NMDA Receptors in Associative Memory Recall , 2002, Science.

[21]  R. Burwell,et al.  Neuron number in the parahippocampal region is preserved in aged rats with spatial learning deficits. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Thomas J. Wills,et al.  Long-term plasticity in hippocampal place-cell representation of environmental geometry , 2002, Nature.

[23]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Context‐specific acquisition of location discrimination by hippocampal place cells , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus , 2003, Nature.

[25]  J. Knierim,et al.  Comparison of population coherence of place cells in hippocampal subfields CA1 and CA3 , 2004, Nature.

[26]  M. Fyhn,et al.  Spatial Representation in the Entorhinal Cortex , 2004, Science.

[27]  J. Guzowski,et al.  Differences in Hippocampal Neuronal Population Responses to Modifications of an Environmental Context: Evidence for Distinct, Yet Complementary, Functions of CA3 and CA1 Ensembles , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Häusser,et al.  Integration of quanta in cerebellar granule cells during sensory processing , 2004, Nature.

[29]  A. Treves,et al.  Distinct Ensemble Codes in Hippocampal Areas CA3 and CA1 , 2004, Science.

[30]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Attractor Dynamics in the Hippocampal Representation of the Local Environment , 2005, Science.

[31]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Independent Codes for Spatial and Episodic Memory in Hippocampal Neuronal Ensembles , 2005, Science.

[32]  J. Knierim,et al.  Major Dissociation Between Medial and Lateral Entorhinal Input to Dorsal Hippocampus , 2005, Science.

[33]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Sparse, environmentally selective expression of Arc RNA in the upper blade of the rodent fascia dentata by brief spatial experience , 2005, Hippocampus.

[34]  T. Hafting,et al.  Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex , 2005, Nature.

[35]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Progressive Transformation of Hippocampal Neuronal Representations in “Morphed” Environments , 2005, Neuron.

[36]  R. Rosenfeld.  Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.