Multi-objective approaches in a single-objective optimization environment

This paper presents two new approaches for transforming a single-objective problem into a multi-objective problem. These approaches add new objectives to a problem to make it multi-objective and use a multi-objective optimization approach to solve the newly defined problem. The first approach is based on relaxation of the constraints of the problem and the other is based on the addition of noise to the objective value or decision variable. Intuitively, these approaches provide more freedom to explore and a reduced likelihood of becoming trapped in local optima. We investigated the characteristics and effectiveness of the proposed approaches by comparing the performance on single-objective problems and multi-objective versions of those same problems. Through numerical examples, we showed that the multi-objective versions produced by relaxing constraints can provide good results and that using the addition of noise can obtain better solutions when the function is multimodal and separable.

[1]  Daisuke Sasaki,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary computation for supersonic wing-shape optimization , 2000, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[2]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[3]  Peter Widmayer,et al.  Evolutionary multiobjective optimization for base station transmitter placement with frequency assignment , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[4]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Applications Of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms , 2004 .

[5]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[6]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[7]  Shigeru Obayashi,et al.  Multiobjective genetic algorithm applied to aerodynamic design of cascade airfoils , 2000, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[8]  C. Coello TREATING CONSTRAINTS AS OBJECTIVES FOR SINGLE-OBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY OPTIMIZATION , 2000 .

[9]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm , 2001 .

[10]  Xin Yao,et al.  Search biases in constrained evolutionary optimization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[11]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  Reducing Local Optima in Single-Objective Problems by Multi-objectivization , 2001, EMO.