Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque.

IN THE LAST DEC,ADE, considerable progress has been made in understanding the physiology of one of the most fundamental aspects of human experience: perception of the visual world. It is now clear that the retina and visual pathways do not simply transmit a mosaic of Iight and dark to some central sensorium. Rather, even at the retinal level, specific features of visual stimuli are detected and their presence communicated to the next level. In cats and monkeys, the geniculostriate visual system consists of a series of converging and diverging connections such that at each successive tier of processing mechanism, single neurons respond to increasingly more specific visual stimuli falling on an increasingly wider area of the retina (19-Z). How far does this analytical-synthetic process continue whereby individual cells have more and more specific trigger features? Are there regions of the brain beyond striate and prestriatel cortex where this processing of visual information is carrie,d further? If so, how far and in what way? Are there cells that are concerned with the storage of visual information as well as its analysis? There are several lines of evidence suggesting that a possible site for further processing of visual information and perhaps even for storage of such information might, in the monkey, be inferotemporal cortexthe cortex on the inferior convexity of the temporal lobe. First, this area receives afferents from prestriate cortex which itself processes visual information received from

[1]  S. Sunderland THE DISTRIBUTION OF COMMISSURAL FIBRES IN THE CORPUS CALLOSUM IN THE MACAQUE MONKEY , 1940, Journal of neurology and psychiatry.

[2]  G. Bonin,et al.  The neocortex of Macaca mulatta , 1947 .

[3]  C. Fox,et al.  The distribution of the anterior commissure in the monkey (Macaca Mulatta). Experimental studies , 1948, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  K. Chow,et al.  A retrograde cell degeneration study of the cortical projection field of the pulvinar in the monkey , 1950, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  M L Wolbarsht,et al.  Glass Insulated Platinum Microelectrode , 1960, Science.

[6]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  T H MEIKLE,et al.  THE ROLE OF THE SUPERIOR COLLICULUS IN VISUALLY GUIDED BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Experimental neurology.

[8]  M. Mishkin,et al.  OCCIPITOTEMPORAL CORTICOCORTICAL CONNECTIONS IN THE RHESUS MONKEY. , 1965, Experimental neurology.

[9]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  A Comparison of the Effects of Inferotemporal and Striate Cortex Lesions on the Visual Behaviour of Rhesus Monkeys , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  G L Gerstein,et al.  Single-unit activity in temporal association cortex of the monkey. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Konorski Integrative activity of the brain , 1967 .

[14]  C. Gross,et al.  Inferotemporal evoked potentials during visual discrimination performance by monkeys. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[15]  C. Trevarthen,et al.  Two mechanisms of vision in primates , 1968, Psychologische Forschung.

[16]  E. Evarts,et al.  Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  E. Evarts A technique for recording activity of subcortical neurons in moving animals. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  José M. R. Delgado,et al.  Integrative Activity of the Brain , 1968, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[19]  N. Humphrey Responses to visual stimuli of units in the superior colliculus of rats and monkeys. , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[20]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  G. Schneider Two visual systems. , 1969, Science.

[22]  S. Zeki Representation of central visual fields in prestriate cortex of monkey. , 1969, Brain research.

[23]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual Receptive Fields of Neurons in Inferotemporal Cortex of the Monkey , 1969, Science.

[24]  C. Gross,et al.  A test of an "efferent model" of the function of inferotemporal cortex in visual discrimination. , 1969, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  M Mishkin,et al.  Further evidence on the locus of the visual area in the temporal lobe of the monkey. , 1969, Experimental neurology.

[26]  P Sterling,et al.  Visual receptive fields in the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  M. Meulders,et al.  Visual receptive fields of neurons in pulvinar, nucleus lateralis posterior and nucleus suprageniculatus thalami of the cat. , 1969, Brain research.

[28]  B. Cragg The topography of the afferent projections in the circumstriate visual cortex of the monkey studied by the Nauta method. , 1969, Vision research.

[29]  N K Humphrey,et al.  What the frog's eye tells the monkey's brain. , 1970, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[30]  S. Zeki Interhemispheric connections of prestriate cortex in monkey. , 1970, Brain research.

[31]  F. Manning Punishment for errors and visual-discrimination learning by monkeys with inferotemporal cortex lesions. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[32]  C. Gross,et al.  Further analysis of visual discrimination deficits following foveal prestriate and inferotemporal lesions in rhesus monkeys. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[33]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Cortical Visual Areas and Their Interactions , 1972 .