In God We Trust. All Others Must Bring Data. - W. Edwards Deming. Using Word Embeddings to Recognize Idioms

Expressions, such as add fuel to the fire, can be interpreted literally or idiomatically depending on the context they occur in. Many Natural Language Processing applications could improve their performance if idiom recognition were improved. Our approach is based on the idea that idioms violate cohesive ties in local contexts, while literal expressions do not. We propose two approaches: 1) Compute inner product of context word vectors with the vector representing a target expression. Since literal vectors predict well local contexts, their inner product with contexts should be larger than idiomatic ones, thereby telling apart literals from idioms; and (2) Compute literal and idiomatic scatter (covariance) matrices from local contexts in word vector space. Since the scatter matrices represent context distributions, we can then measure the difference between the distributions using the Frobenius norm. For comparison, we implement Fazly et al. (2009)’s, Sporleder and Li (2009)’s, and Li and Sporleder (2010b)’s methods and apply them to our data. We provide experimental results validating the proposed techniques.

[1]  Caroline Sporleder,et al.  Unsupervised Recognition of Literal and Non-Literal Use of Idiomatic Expressions , 2009, EACL.

[2]  Afsaneh Fazly,et al.  Pulling their Weight: Exploiting Syntactic Forms for the Automatic Identification of Idiomatic Expressions in Context , 2007 .

[3]  Cristina Cacciari,et al.  The place of idioms in a literal and metaphorical world. , 1993 .

[4]  Caroline Sporleder,et al.  Linguistic Cues for Distinguishing Literal and Non-Literal Usages , 2010, COLING.

[5]  Afsaneh Fazly,et al.  Unsupervised Type and Token Identification of Idiomatic Expressions , 2009, CL.

[6]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Corpus-based Studies of German Idioms and Light Verbs , 2006 .

[7]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  The VNC-Tokens Dataset , 2008 .

[8]  Caroline Sporleder,et al.  Using Gaussian Mixture Models to Detect Figurative Language in Context , 2010, NAACL.

[9]  Ekaterina Vylomova,et al.  Classifying Idiomatic and Literal Expressions Using Topic Models and Intensity of Emotions , 2014, EMNLP.

[10]  Maggie Seaton,et al.  Collins COBUILD idioms dictionary , 2011 .

[11]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.

[12]  Anoop Sarkar,et al.  A Clustering Approach for Nearly Unsupervised Recognition of Nonliteral Language , 2006, EACL.

[13]  Aline Villavicencio,et al.  Lexical Encoding of MWEs , 2004 .

[14]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.

[15]  Caroline Sporleder,et al.  A Cohesion Graph Based Approach for Unsupervised Recognition of Literal and Non-literal Use of Multiword Expressions , 2009, Graph-based Methods for Natural Language Processing.

[16]  I. R. McCaig,et al.  Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English , 1994 .

[17]  I. Sag,et al.  Idioms , 2015 .

[18]  Pavel Pudil,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2006 .

[19]  Eugenie Giesbrecht,et al.  Automatic Identification of Non-Compositional Multi-Word Expressions using Latent Semantic Analysis , 2006 .

[20]  Timothy Baldwin,et al.  Multiword Expressions: A Pain in the Neck for NLP , 2002, CICLing.