Improving the Initial Image Retrieval Set by Inter-Query Learning with One-Class SVMs

Relevance Feedback attempts to reduce the semantic gap between a user’s perception of similarity and a feature-based representation of an image by asking the user to provide feedback regarding the relevance or non-relevance of the retrieved images. This is intra-query learning. However, in most current systems, all prior experience is lost whenever a user generates a new query thus inter-query information is not used. In this paper, we focus on the possibility of incorporating prior experience (obtained from the historical interaction of users with the system) to improve the retrieval performance on future queries. We propose learning one-class SVMs from retrieval experience to represent the set memberships of users’ query concepts. Using a fuzzy classification approach, this historical knowledge is then incorporated into future queries to improve the retrieval performance. In order to learn the set membership of a user’s query concept, a one-class SVM maps the relevant or training images into a nonlinearly transformed kernel-induced feature space and attempts to include most of those images into a hyper-sphere. The use of kernels allows the one-class SVM to deal with the non-linearity of the distribution of training images in an efficient manner, while at the same time, providing good generalization. The proposed approach is evaluated against real data sets and the results obtained confirm the effectiveness of using prior experience in improving retrieval performance.

[1]  Bir Bhanu,et al.  Improving retrieval performance by long-term relevance information , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[2]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  QBIC project: querying images by content, using color, texture, and shape , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  J. C. Peters,et al.  Fuzzy cluster analysis--a new method to predict future cardiac events in patients with positive stress tests. , 1998, Japanese circulation journal.

[4]  David M. J. Tax,et al.  One-class classification , 2001 .

[5]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[6]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Relevance feedback: a power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval , 1998, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[7]  Bir Bhanu,et al.  Probabilistic Feature Relevance Learning for Content-Based Image Retrieval , 1999, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[8]  Mingjing Li,et al.  Statistical correlation analysis in image retrieval , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Bikramjit Banerjee,et al.  Kernel Index for Relevance feedback Retrieval , 2002, International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery.

[10]  K. Wakimoto,et al.  Efficient and Effective Querying by Image Content , 1994 .

[11]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  One-class SVM for learning in image retrieval , 2001, Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205).

[12]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  SV Estimation of a Distribution's Support , 1999, NIPS 1999.

[13]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Support Vector Method for Novelty Detection , 1999, NIPS.

[14]  Douglas R. Heisterkamp Building a latent semantic index of an image database from patterns of relevance feedback , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[15]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Content-based image retrieval with relevance feedback in MARS , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  Kenneth G. Manton,et al.  Fuzzy Cluster Analysis , 2005 .

[17]  Marko Balabanovic,et al.  Exploring Versus Exploiting when Learning User Models for Text Recommendation , 2004, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[18]  U. M. Feyyad Data mining and knowledge discovery: making sense out of data , 1996 .