Supervised Band Selection Using Local Spatial Information for Hyperspectral Image

In order to alleviate the subsequent computation burden and storage requirement, band selection has been widely adopted to reduce the dimensionality of hyperspectral images, and the current methods mainly consist of the supervised and the unsupervised. Although these supervised methods have better performance, those unsupervised methods dominate the band selection field. In this letter, based on the unique properties of hyperspectral images, we propose a very simple but effective supervised band selection algorithm based on the local spatial information of the hyperspectral image and wrapper method. By using both the information of labeled and unlabeled pixels of the hyperspectral image, our proposed algorithm consistently outperforms the classical wrapper method. We use five widely used real hyperspectral data to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms. We also analyze the relationship between our band selection algorithm and the well-known Markov random field classifier.

[1]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Advances in Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Images , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Zheng Zhang,et al.  Semisupervised Classification of Remote Sensing Images With Hierarchical Spatial Similarity , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[4]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Segmentation and classification of hyperspectral images using watershed transformation , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[5]  Qian Du,et al.  A joint band prioritization and band-decorrelation approach to band selection for hyperspectral image classification , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  A band selection technique for spectral classification , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[7]  Jane Labadin,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information , 2015, 2015 9th International Conference on IT in Asia (CITA).

[8]  Qian Du,et al.  An Efficient Method for Supervised Hyperspectral Band Selection , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[9]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  PCA versus LDA , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Classification and feature extraction for remote sensing images from urban areas based on morphological transformations , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Kang Sun,et al.  Exemplar Component Analysis: A Fast Band Selection Method for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[12]  LinLin Shen,et al.  Unsupervised Band Selection for Hyperspectral Imagery Classification Without Manual Band Removal , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  Supervised band selection for optimal use of data from airborne hyperspectral sensors , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[14]  Peter Bajcsy,et al.  Hyperspectral image data mining for band selection in agricultural applications , 2004 .

[15]  Aakanksha Rana,et al.  Graph-cut-based model for spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images , 2014, 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[16]  Qian Du,et al.  Similarity-Based Unsupervised Band Selection for Hyperspectral Image Analysis , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[17]  Qian Du,et al.  Fast supervised hyperspectral band selection using graphics processing unit , 2012 .

[18]  Qiong Jackson,et al.  Adaptive Bayesian contextual classification based on Markov random fields , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[19]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.