When Elephants Fly: Differential Sensitivity of Right and Left Inferior Frontal Gyri to Discourse and World Knowledge

Both local discourse and world knowledge are known to influence sentence processing. We investigated how these two sources of information conspire in language comprehension. Two types of critical sentences, correct and world knowledge anomalies, were preceded by either a neutral or a local context. The latter made the world knowledge anomalies more acceptable or plausible. We predicted that the effect of world knowledge anomalies would be weaker for the local context. World knowledge effects have previously been observed in the left inferior frontal region (Brodmann's area 45/47). In the current study, an effect of world knowledge was present in this region in the neutral context. We also observed an effect in the right inferior frontal gyrus, which was more sensitive to the discourse manipulation than the left inferior frontal gyrus. In addition, the left angular gyrus reacted strongly to the degree of discourse coherence between the context and critical sentence. Overall, both world knowledge and the discourse context affect the process of meaning unification, but do so by recruiting partly different sets of brain areas.

[1]  Patrizia Baraldi,et al.  Humor Comprehension and Appreciation: An fMRI Study , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Baddeley.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Jackendoff.  Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[4]  Susan A Duffy,et al.  Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[5]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Dissociating stimulus‐driven semantic and phonological effect during reading and naming , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[7]  A. Hillis,et al.  Neural regions essential for distinct cognitive processes underlying picture naming. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Effective connectivity of cortical and subcortical regions during unification of sentence structure , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[10]  L. Aravind,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2022 .

[11]  D. A. Robertson,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Cognitive Process of Mapping During Discourse Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[12]  Mark Beeman,et al.  Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. , 1998 .

[13]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Stimulus design is an obstacle course: 560 matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[14]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Discourse comprehension. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  T. Crow,et al.  Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: the forgotten hemisphere? , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  M. Jung-Beeman.  Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes , 2007, Brain and Language.

[18]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  When language meets action: the neural integration of gesture and speech. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  P. Hagoort,et al.  The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension. Evidence from the N400 , 2007, Brain Research.

[20]  P. Hagoort.  On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  A Parallel Architecture perspective on language processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[22]  M. Dapretto,et al.  Making sense during conversation: an fMRI study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[23]  Jiang Xu,et al.  Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  Colin Humphries,et al.  Time course of semantic processes during sentence comprehension: An fMRI study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[25]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[26]  Rachel Giora,et al.  Is metaphor special? , 2007, Brain and Language.

[27]  T. Hendler,et al.  An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions , 2007, Brain and Language.

[28]  Debra L. Long,et al.  The propositional structure of discourse in the two cerebral hemispheres , 2005, Brain and Language.

[29]  Michael Erb,et al.  Laterality in metaphor processing: Lack of evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging for the right hemisphere theory , 2007, Brain and Language.

[30]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Making sense of discourse: An fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  S. Bookheimer.  Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  Michael J. Brammer,et al.  How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: The role of the right frontal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Beyond the sentence given , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[37]  Michael J. Brammer,et al.  Deriving meaning: Distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-meaningful sentences , 2007, Brain and Language.

[38]  C. Price.  The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging , 2000, Journal of anatomy.

[39]  G. Kempen,et al.  Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.

[40]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1986 .