Using parameters and discriminants for product line requirements

Reuse and Requirements Engineering are very important for efficient and successful product development. However, there are many open issues for performing them well in practice, especially reuse of requirements. This paper addresses several of these issues by making use of parameters and discriminants for product line requirements. Discriminants are a special kind of requirement that differentiate one product from another. They represent qualitative variability in a product line model, while parameters represent quantitative variability. In this paper these techniques are combined in the form of parameterized discriminants. Using the techniques and a metamodel for the representation of a product line model, a stakeholder-viewpoint oriented process is defined for capturing product line requirements and constructing a product line model. From such a generic model and with well-defined semantics, selecting single product application requirements can be done systematically, guaranteeing the property that the resulting single product satisfies the constraints of the product line model. Even for unsystematic free selection as often used in practice, it can be formally verified whether this property holds. The approach is illustrated using a hypothetical mobile phone example and draws upon case study work with real-world requirements. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng

[1]  Paul Clements,et al.  Software product lines - practices and patterns , 2001, SEI series in software engineering.

[2]  Mike Mannion,et al.  Using Viewpoints to Define Domain Requirements , 1998, IEEE Softw..

[3]  Javier Cámara,et al.  Theorem Proving for Product Line Model Verification , 2003, PFE.

[4]  Patrick Donohoe,et al.  Feature-Oriented Project Line Engineering , 2002, IEEE Softw..

[5]  Juha Savolainen,et al.  Feature Interaction and Dependencies: Modeling Features for Reengineering a Legacy Product Line , 2002, SPLC.

[6]  Jan Bosch,et al.  On the notion of variability in software product lines , 2001, Proceedings Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture.

[7]  Stefania Gnesi,et al.  A Methodology for the Derivation and Verification of Use Cases for Product Lines , 2004, SPLC.

[8]  Maurizio Morisio,et al.  Success and Failure Factors in Software Reuse , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[9]  Armin P. Schulz,et al.  Design for changeability (DfC): Principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle , 2005 .

[10]  Jürgen Börstler,et al.  The PLUSS Approach - Domain Modeling with Features, Use Cases and Use Case Realizations , 2005, SPLC.

[11]  Klaus Schmid A comprehensive product line scoping approach and its validation , 2002, ICSE '02.

[12]  Don S. Batory,et al.  Feature Models, Grammars, and Propositional Formulas , 2005, SPLC.

[13]  Martin L. Griss,et al.  Integrating feature modeling with the RSEB , 1998, Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse (Cat. No.98TB100203).

[14]  Dániel Fey,et al.  Feature Modeling: A Meta-Model to Enhance Usability and Usefulness , 2002, SPLC.

[15]  Jan Bosch,et al.  A taxonomy and hierarchy of variability dependencies in software product family engineering , 2004, Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2004. COMPSAC 2004..

[16]  Wing Lam,et al.  Managing requirements in a product family approach to systems engineering , 1999 .

[17]  Hermann Kaindl A scenario-based approach for requirements engineering: Experience in a telecommunication software development project , 2005 .

[18]  Matthias Weber,et al.  Using Product Sets to Define Complex Product Decisions , 2005, SPLC.

[19]  Krzysztof Czarnecki,et al.  Staged Configuration Using Feature Models , 2004, SPLC.

[20]  Hermann Kaindl,et al.  Reusing single system requirements from application family requirements , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Software Engineering (IEEE Cat. No.99CB37002).

[21]  Jürgen Börstler,et al.  The PLUSS toolkit?: extending telelogic DOORS and IBM-rational rose to support product line use case modeling , 2005, ASE '05.

[22]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Software Product Line Engineering , 2005 .

[23]  Miyoung Jeong,et al.  Quality function deployment: An extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry , 1998 .

[24]  Marco Sinnema,et al.  Experiences in Software Product Families: Problems and Issues During Product Derivation , 2004, SPLC.

[25]  Klaus Schmid,et al.  Product Line Engineering: The State of the Practice , 2003, IEEE Softw..