Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view

Aubert and Foerster (1857) are frequently cited for having shown that the lower visual acuity of peripheral vision can be compensated for by increasing stimulus size. This result is seemingly consistent with the concept of cortical magnification, and it has been confirmed by many subsequent authors. Yet it is rarely noted that Aubert and Foerster also observed a loss of the “quality of form.” We have studied the recognition of numeric characters in foveal and eccentric vision by determining the contrast required for 67% correct identification. At each eccentricity, the lowest contrast threshold is achieved with a specific stimulus size. But the contrast thresholds for these optimal stimuli are not independent of retinal eccentricity as cortical magnification scaling would predict. With high-contrast targets, however, threshold target sizes were consistent with cortical magnification out to 6° eccentricity. Beyond 6°, threshold target sizes were larger than cortical magnification predicted. We also investigated recognition performance in the presence of neighboring characters (crowding phenomenon). Target character size, distance of flanking characters, and precision of focusing of attention all affect recognition. The influence of these parameters is different in the fovea and in the periphery. Our findings confirm Aubert and Foerster’s original observation of a qualitative difference between foveal and peripheral vision.

[1]  C. H. Judd.  La perception visuelle de l'espace. , 1902 .

[2]  B. Bourdon,et al.  La perception visuelle de l'espace , 1902 .

[3]  J. Wagner.  Experimentelle Beiträge zur Psychologie des Lesens , 1918 .

[4]  W. Korte,et al.  Über die Gestaltauffassung im indirekten Sehen , 1923 .

[5]  Holger Ehlers,et al.  V: THE MOVEMENTS OF THE EYES DURING READING , 1936 .

[6]  H. Woodrow,et al.  The Effect of Pattern upon Simultaneous Letter-Span , 1938 .

[7]  Elek Ludvigh,et al.  Extrafoveal Visual Acuity as Measured with Snellen Test-Letters , 1941 .

[8]  A. B. Nutt.  Binocular vision. , 1945, The British orthoptic journal.

[9]  H EHLERS,et al.  Clinical testing of visual acuity. , 1953, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  F. W. Weymouth.  Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. , 1958, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[12]  [Angular visual acuity and morphoscopic visual acuity in amblyopia ex anopsia]. , 1959, Bulletin de la Societe belge d'ophtalmologie.

[13]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  E. Averbach,et al.  Short-term memory in vision , 1961 .

[15]  H. Burian,et al.  A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. , 1962, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  M C FLOM,et al.  VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  M C FLOM,et al.  Contour Interaction and Visual Resolution: Contralateral Effects , 1963, Science.

[18]  J. L. Hall.  Maximum‐Likelihood Sequential Procedure for Estimation of Psychometric Functions , 1968 .

[19]  Peter Shaw,et al.  Processing of tachistoscopic displays with controlled order of characters and spaces , 1969 .

[20]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[21]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Lateral masking for letters with unlimited viewing time , 1971 .

[22]  H. Bouma.  Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. , 1971, Vision research.

[23]  CONTRAST SENSITIVITY OF THE HUMAN RETINA* , 1972, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[24]  D. R. Brown,et al.  Lateral visual masking: Supraretinal effects when viewing linear arrays with unlimited viewing time , 1972 .

[25]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[26]  P M Monti.  Lateral Masking of end Elements by Inner Elements in Tachistoscopic Pattern Perception , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  L. O. Harvey,et al.  Light-difference threshold and subjective brightness in the periphery of the visual field , 1973, Psychologische Forschung.

[28]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[29]  R Hilz,et al.  Functional organization of the peripheral retina: sensitivity to periodic stimuli. , 1974, Vision research.

[30]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Effect of dioptrics on peripheral visual acuity , 1975, Vision Research.

[31]  Jerome Y. Lettvin,et al.  On Seeing Sidelong , 1976 .

[32]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. I. The near peripheral visual field (eccentricity 0 degrees-8 degrees). , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[33]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision , 1978, Nature.

[34]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Effects of target size and eccentricity on visual detection and resolution , 1978, Vision Research.

[35]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. IV. The influence of the mean retinal illuminance. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[36]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  Channels in Vision: Basic Aspects , 1978 .

[37]  Eric L. Schwartz,et al.  Computational anatomy and functional architecture of striate cortex: A spatial mapping approach to perceptual coding , 1980, Vision Research.

[38]  Ivar Lie,et al.  Visual detection and resolution as a function of retinal locus , 1980, Vision Research.

[39]  A Pentland,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation: The best PEST , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  R. J. Watt,et al.  The modulation transfer function of a display oscilloscope: Measurements and comments , 1982, Vision Research.

[41]  I Rentschler,et al.  Modelling perceptual distortion: amplitude and phase transmission in the human visual system. , 1982, Human neurobiology.

[42]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[43]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Temporal contrast sensitivity and cortical magnification , 1982, Vision Research.

[44]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  G Wolford,et al.  Lateral masking as a function of spacing , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[47]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[48]  Orientation Sensitivity in the Peripheral Visual Field , 1984, Perception.

[49]  D. H. Kelly,et al.  Retinal inhomogeneity. I. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[50]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Numerosity judgments in peripheral vision: Limitations of the cortical magnification hypothesis , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[51]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision , 1985, Nature.

[52]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[53]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Sensitivity to phase distortions in central and peripheral vision , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  John R. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and visual attention , 1985 .

[55]  I Rentschler,et al.  Hidden-face recognition: comparing foveal and extrafoveal performance. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[56]  M. Minsky.  The Society of Mind , 1986 .

[57]  J S Pointer,et al.  THE CORTICAL MAGNIFICATION FACTOR AND PHOTOPIC VISION , 1986, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[58]  J Y Lettvin,et al.  Enhancing the Perception of Form in Peripheral Vision , 1986, Perception.

[59]  Terry Caelli,et al.  Digital image-processing techniques for the display of images and modeling of visual perception , 1986 .

[60]  Lewis O. Harvey,et al.  Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds , 1986 .

[61]  Christopher H Evans,et al.  Visual Crowding in Young Children , 1986 .

[62]  S. Klein,et al.  Sampling in spatial vision , 1986, Nature.

[63]  J Saarinen,et al.  Perception of Positional Relationships between Line Segments in Eccentric Vision , 1987, Perception.

[64]  R Näsänen,et al.  Cortical magnification and peripheral vision. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[65]  D. Regan.  Low-contrast visual acuity test for pediatric use. , 1988, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[66]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[67]  L. Ling,et al.  Magnification factors and the organization of the human striate cortex. , 1988, Human neurobiology.

[68]  A. Cowey,et al.  The lengths of thefibres of henle in the retina of macaque monkeys: Implications for vision , 1988, Neuroscience.

[69]  B. Boycott,et al.  Cortical magnification factor and the ganglion cell density of the primate retina , 1989, Nature.

[70]  M. Arbib,et al.  Vision, brain, and cooperative computation , 1990 .

[71]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Two mechanisms for localization? Evidence for separation-dependent and separation-independent processing of position information , 1990, Vision Research.

[72]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Society of Mind: A Response to Four Reviews , 1991, Artif. Intell..