Investigating human audio-visual object perception with a combination of hypothesis-generating and hypothesis-testing fMRI analysis tools

Primate multisensory object perception involves distributed brain regions. To investigate the network character of these regions of the human brain, we applied data-driven group spatial independent component analysis (ICA) to a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data set acquired during a passive audio-visual (AV) experiment with common object stimuli. We labeled three group-level independent component (IC) maps as auditory (A), visual (V), and AV, based on their spatial layouts and activation time courses. The overlap between these IC maps served as definition of a distributed network of multisensory candidate regions including superior temporal, ventral occipito-temporal, posterior parietal and prefrontal regions. During an independent second fMRI experiment, we explicitly tested their involvement in AV integration. Activations in nine out of these twelve regions met the max-criterion (A < AV > V) for multisensory integration. Comparison of this approach with a general linear model-based region-of-interest definition revealed its complementary value for multisensory neuroimaging. In conclusion, we estimated functional networks of uni- and multisensory functional connectivity from one dataset and validated their functional roles in an independent dataset. These findings demonstrate the particular value of ICA for multisensory neuroimaging research and using independent datasets to test hypotheses generated from a data-driven analysis.

[1]  Sidney S. Simon,et al.  Merging of the Senses , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[2]  Rui Liao,et al.  Isolation and minimization of head motion‐induced signal variations in fMRI data using independent component analysis , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Multisensory integration: psychophysics, neurophysiology, and computation , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  S. Zeki,et al.  The chronoarchitecture of the cerebral cortex , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[6]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: Evidence from functional MRI , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[7]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Towards natural stimulation in fMRI—Issues of data analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[8]  Aapo Hyv Fast and Robust Fixed-Point Algorithms for Independent Component Analysis , 1999 .

[9]  M. Wibral The BOLD fMRI Signal under Anaesthesia and Hyperoxia , 2007 .

[10]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[11]  V D Calhoun,et al.  Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task‐related waveforms , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[12]  A. Ghazanfar,et al.  Is neocortex essentially multisensory? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  G. Calvert Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  K. Tamura,et al.  Metabolic engineering of plant alkaloid biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2001 .

[17]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  fMR-adaptation indicates selectivity to audiovisual content congruency in distributed clusters in human superior temporal cortex , 2010, BMC Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Greicius,et al.  A cross‐modal system linking primary auditory and visual cortices: Evidence from intrinsic fMRI connectivity analysis , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  Multisensory interactions within human primary cortices revealed by BOLD dynamics. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Noise Reduction in BOLD-Based fMRI Using Component Analysis , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory contributions to low-level, ‘unisensory’ processing , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  U. Noppeney,et al.  Distinct Functional Contributions of Primary Sensory and Association Areas to Audiovisual Integration in Object Categorization , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Object Familiarity and Semantic Congruency Modulate Responses in Cortical Audiovisual Integration Areas , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Baxter P Rogers,et al.  Power spectrum ranked independent component analysis of a periodic fMRI complex motor paradigm , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[27]  A. Amedi,et al.  Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  B. Argall,et al.  Integration of Auditory and Visual Information about Objects in Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[29]  James W. Lewis,et al.  Audio-Visual Perception of Everyday Natural Objects - Hemodynamic Studies in Humans , 2010 .

[30]  Tulay Adali,et al.  A method for comparing group fMRI data using independent component analysis: application to visual, motor and visuomotor tasks. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[31]  R. Goebel,et al.  Visual target modulation of functional connectivity networks revealed by self‐organizing group ICA , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[32]  U. Noppeney,et al.  Perceptual Decisions Formed by Accumulation of Audiovisual Evidence in Prefrontal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Jochen Kaiser,et al.  Audiovisual Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Adaptation Reveals Multisensory Integration Effects in Object-Related Sensory Cortices , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Goebel,et al.  Integration of Letters and Speech Sounds in the Human Brain , 2004, Neuron.

[35]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  O. Tervonen,et al.  The effect of model order selection in group PICA , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[37]  John C Gore,et al.  Assessing functional connectivity in the human brain by fMRI. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[38]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Activity patterns in human motion sensitive areas depend on the interpretation of global motion , 2001, NeuroImage.

[39]  E. Macaluso Multisensory Processing in Sensory-Specific Cortical Areas , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[40]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  J.C. Rajapakse,et al.  Exploratory analysis of brain connectivity with ICA , 2006, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[42]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[43]  C. Price,et al.  The role of the posterior superior temporal sulcus in audiovisual processing. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Fabrizio Esposito,et al.  Neural network of speech monitoring overlaps with overt speech production and comprehension networks: A sequential spatial and temporal ICA study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[45]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  T. James,et al.  An additive-factors design to disambiguate neuronal and areal convergence: measuring multisensory interactions between audio, visual, and haptic sensory streams using fMRI , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  Rajesh Nandy,et al.  Estimation of the intrinsic dimensionality of fMRI data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[48]  Christoph Kayser,et al.  Do early sensory cortices integrate cross-modal information? , 2007, Brain Structure and Function.

[49]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Cross-Modal Processing in Early Visual and Auditory Cortices depends on Expected Statistical Relationship of Multisensory Information , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Multisensory Object Perception in the Primate Brain , 2010 .

[51]  U. Noppeney,et al.  Superadditive responses in superior temporal sulcus predict audiovisual benefits in object categorization. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  M. Naumer,et al.  Semantics and the multisensory brain: How meaning modulates processes of audio-visual integration , 2008, Brain Research.

[53]  Sophie M. Wuerger,et al.  Interactions between Auditory and Visual Semantic Stimulus Classes: Evidence for Common Processing Networks for Speech and Body Actions , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  C. F. Beckmann,et al.  Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis , 2005, NeuroImage.

[55]  W. Singer,et al.  Retinotopic effects during spatial audio-visual integration , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Joost X. Maier,et al.  Natural, Metaphoric, and Linguistic Auditory Direction Signals Have Distinct Influences on Visual Motion Processing , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  Statistical criteria in fMRI studies of multisensory integration , 2005, Neuroinformatics.

[58]  Michael S Beauchamp,et al.  See me, hear me, touch me: multisensory integration in lateral occipital-temporal cortex , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[59]  Lars Muckli,et al.  Cortical Plasticity of Audio–Visual Object Representations , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[61]  Ryan A. Stevenson,et al.  Superadditive BOLD activation in superior temporal sulcus with threshold non-speech objects , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[62]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[63]  E. Formisano,et al.  Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[64]  J. Driver,et al.  Multisensory Interplay Reveals Crossmodal Influences on ‘Sensory-Specific’ Brain Regions, Neural Responses, and Judgments , 2008, Neuron.

[65]  J. Rieger,et al.  Audiovisual Temporal Correspondence Modulates Human Multisensory Superior Temporal Sulcus Plus Primary Sensory Cortices , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Audio-visual crossmodal interactions in environmental perception: an fMRI investigation , 2004, Cognitive Processing.

[67]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[68]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The effect of prior visual information on recognition of speech and sounds. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.