Two Mechanisms of Human Contingency Learning

How do humans learn contingencies between events? Both pathway-strengthening and inference-based process models have been proposed to explain contingency learning. We propose that each of these processes is used in different conditions. Participants viewed displays that contained single or paired objects and learned which displays were usually followed by the appearance of a dot. Some participants predicted whether the dot would appear before seeing the outcome, whereas other participants were required to respond quickly if the dot appeared shortly after the display. In the prediction task, instructions guiding participants to infer which objects caused the dot to appear were necessary in order for contingencies associated with one object to influence participants’ predictions about the object with which it had been paired. In the response task, contingencies associated with one object affected responses to its pair mate irrespective of whether or not participants were given causal instructions. Our results challenge single-mechanism accounts of contingency learning and suggest that the mechanisms underlying performance in the two tasks are distinct.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Dynamic Integration of Reward and Stimulus Information in Perceptual Decision-Making , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  TWO MECHANISMS OF CONTINGENCY LEARNING 1 " RUNNING HEAD : TWO MECHANISMS OF CONTINGENCY LEARNING Two Mechanisms of Human Contingency Learning , 2011 .

[3]  Gary M. Oppenheim,et al.  The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production , 2010, Cognition.

[4]  D. Shanks.  Learning: from association to cognition. , 2010, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  David Ardia,et al.  DEoptim: An R Package for Global Optimization by Differential Evolution , 2009 .

[6]  Christopher J. Mitchell,et al.  The propositional nature of human associative learning , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  J. Houwer.  The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models , 2009 .

[8]  F Gregory Ashby,et al.  Initial Training With Difficult Items Facilitates Information Integration, but Not Rule-Based Category Learning , 2008, Psychological science.

[9]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Brian D. Glass,et al.  When more is less: Feedback effects in perceptual category learning , 2008, Cognition.

[11]  Klaus G. Melchers,et al.  Stimulus coding in human associative learning: Flexible representations of parts and wholes , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[12]  T. Beckers,et al.  The role of memory for compounds in cue competition , 2007 .

[13]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Bayes nets and babies: infants' developing statistical reasoning abilities and their representation of causal knowledge. , 2007, Developmental science.

[14]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  R. Gray,et al.  Effects of focus of attention on baseball batting performance in players of differing skill levels. , 2007, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[16]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Blickets and babies: the development of causal reasoning in toddlers and infants. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[17]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Dissociating the effects of automatic activation and explicit expectancy on reaction times in a simple associative learning task. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: experimental and computational studies , 2006, Cognition.

[19]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Structure and strength in causal induction , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  A. Meyer,et al.  Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences , 1988, Machine Learning.

[24]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  A ballistic model of choice response time. , 2005, Psychological review.

[25]  R. Sun,et al.  The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: a dual-process approach. , 2005, Psychological review.

[26]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Human category learning. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  L. Squire.  Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective , 2004, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[28]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: what participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  R. E. Blaser,et al.  Backward blocking in honeybees , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[30]  David M. Sobel,et al.  A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets. , 2004, Psychological review.

[31]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.

[32]  Klaus G. Melchers,et al.  Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory. , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[33]  T. Beckers,et al.  Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[34]  D. Sobel.  Running head: CHILDREN’S CAUSAL INFERENCES Children’s causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers , 2003 .

[35]  Christopher J. Mitchell,et al.  Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Christopher J. Mitchell,et al.  Backward and forward Blocking in Human Electrodermal Conditioning: Blocking Requires an Assumption of Outcome Additivity , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[37]  T. Beckers,et al.  Outcome and Cue Properties Modulate Blocking , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Theory-Based Causal Inference , 2002, NIPS.

[40]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[41]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: principles of cortical and hippocampal function. , 2001, Psychological review.

[43]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain , 2000 .

[44]  Michael R. Waldmann,et al.  Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  L R Squire,et al.  Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.

[46]  D. Shanks,et al.  FEATURE- AND RULE-BASED GENERALIZATION IN HUMAN ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING , 1998 .

[47]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[48]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. , 1998, Psychological review.

[49]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Blocking of Pavlovian Conditioning in Humans , 1997 .

[50]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  Determining whether causal order affects cue selection in human contingency learning: Comments on Shanks and Lopez (1996) , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[51]  L. Squire,et al.  Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Within Compound Associations Mediate the Retrospective Revaluation of Causality Judgements , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[53]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[54]  L. Squire,et al.  Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[56]  L. Squire,et al.  Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness. , 1994, Learning & memory.

[57]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements , 1994 .

[58]  Douglas A. Williams,et al.  Configural and elemental strategies in predictive learning. , 1994 .

[59]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Attention and awareness in sequence learning , 1993 .

[60]  Michael R. Waldmann,et al.  Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Seth J. Ramus,et al.  Intact Artificial Grammar Learning in Amnesia: Dissociation of Classification Learning and Explicit Memory for Specific Instances , 1992 .

[62]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[63]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[64]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[65]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , 1995 .

[66]  R. Rescorla.  Pavlovian conditioning. It's not what you think it is. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[67]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .

[68]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[69]  H. Hoffman,et al.  Unconscious acquisition of complex procedural knowledge. , 1987 .

[70]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[71]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[72]  P. Perruchet.  A pitfall for the expectancy theory of human eyelid conditioning , 1985, The Pavlovian journal of biological science.

[73]  D. Shanks.  Forward and Backward Blocking in Human Contingency Judgement , 1985 .

[74]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Judgement of Act-Outcome Contingency: The Role of Selective Attribution , 1984 .

[75]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[76]  L. Squire,et al.  Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. , 1980, Science.

[77]  L. Allan.  A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks , 1980 .

[78]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[79]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[80]  A. F. Carr.  Latent inhibition and overshadowing in conditioned emotional response conditioning with rats. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[81]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[82]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[83]  L. Kamin.  Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning , 1967 .

[84]  L. Kamin.  Attention-like processes in classical conditioning , 1967 .

[85]  E. Fischer.  Conditioned Reflexes , 1942, American journal of physical medicine.

[86]  E. Tolman.  There is more than one kind of learning. , 1949, Psychological review.

[87]  E. Tolman.  Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[88]  I. Krechevsky,et al.  "Hypotheses" in rats. , 1932 .