Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms

In this paper we describe an efficient approach for multimodal function optimization using genetic algorithms (GAs). We recommend the use of adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation to realize the twin goals of maintaining diversity in the population and sustaining the, convergence capacity of the GA. In the adaptive genetic algorithm (AGA), the probabilities of crossover and mutation, p/sub c/ and p/sub m/, are varied depending on the fitness values of the solutions. High-fitness solutions are 'protected', while solutions with subaverage fitnesses are totally disrupted. By using adaptively varying p/sub c/ and p/sub ,/ we also provide a solution to the problem of deciding the optimal values of p/sub c/ and p/sub m/, i.e., p/sub c/ and p/sub m/ need not be specified at all. The AGA is compared with previous approaches for adapting operator probabilities in genetic algorithms. The Schema theorem is derived for the AGA, and the working of the AGA is analyzed. We compare the performance of the AGA with that of the standard GA (SGA) in optimizing several nontrivial multimodal functions with varying degrees of complexity. >

[1]  Lawrence Davis,et al.  Bit-Climbing, Representational Bias, and Test Suite Design , 1991, ICGA.

[2]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms and Walsh Functions: Part II, Deception and Its Analysis , 1989, Complex Syst..

[3]  Lawrence. Davis,et al.  Handbook Of Genetic Algorithms , 1990 .

[4]  Lawrence Davis,et al.  Adapting Operator Probabilities in Genetic Algorithms , 1989, ICGA.

[5]  K. Dejong,et al.  An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems , 1975 .

[6]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Messy Genetic Algorithms: Motivation, Analysis, and First Results , 1989, Complex Syst..

[7]  Lawrence Davis,et al.  Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing , 1987 .

[8]  Rajarshi Das,et al.  A Study of Control Parameters Affecting Online Performance of Genetic Algorithms for Function Optimization , 1989, ICGA.

[9]  John J. Grefenstette,et al.  Optimization of Control Parameters for Genetic Algorithms , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  Adaptive System Design: A Genetic Approach , 1980, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[11]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  A Note on Boltzmann Tournament Selection for Genetic Algorithms and Population-Oriented Simulated Annealing , 1990, Complex Syst..

[12]  Oscar H. Ibarra,et al.  Polynomially Complete Fault Detection Problems , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[13]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Messy Genetic Algorithms Revisited: Studies in Mixed Size and Scale , 1990, Complex Syst..

[14]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms with Sharing for Multimodalfunction Optimization , 1987, ICGA.

[15]  L. Darrell Whitley,et al.  Genetic algorithms and neural networks: optimizing connections and connectivity , 1990, Parallel Comput..

[16]  Kenneth A. De Jong,et al.  Genetic algorithms: A 10 Year Perspective , 1985, ICGA.

[17]  D. J. Smith,et al.  A Study of Permutation Crossover Operators on the Traveling Salesman Problem , 1987, ICGA.

[18]  Dan Boneh,et al.  On genetic algorithms , 1995, COLT '95.

[19]  L. Darrell Whitley,et al.  GENITOR II: a distributed genetic algorithm , 1990, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[20]  Reinhard Männer,et al.  Towards an Optimal Mutation Probability for Genetic Algorithms , 1990, PPSN.