Transforming neural computations and representing time.

Motifs of neural circuitry seem surprisingly conserved over different areas of neocortex or of paleocortex, while performing quite different sensory processing tasks. This apparent paradox may be resolved by the fact that seemingly different problems in sensory information processing are related by transformations (changes of variables) that convert one problem into another. The same basic algorithm that is appropriate to the recognition of a known odor quality, independent of the strength of the odor, can be used to recognize a vocalization (e.g., a spoken syllable), independent of whether it is spoken quickly or slowly. To convert one problem into the other, a new representation of time sequences is needed. The time that has elapsed since a recent event must be represented in neural activity. The electrophysiological hallmarks of cells that are involved in generating such a representation of time are discussed. The anatomical relationships between olfactory and auditory pathways suggest relevant experiments. The neurophysiological mechanism for the psychophysical logarithmic encoding of time duration would be of direct use for interconverting olfactory and auditory processing problems. Such reuse of old algorithms in new settings and representations is related to the way that evolution develops new biochemistry.

[1]  Dr. Susumu Ohno.  Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[2]  D. Tank,et al.  In Vivo Ca2+ Dynamics in a Cricket Auditory Neuron: An Example of Chemical Computation , 1994, Science.

[3]  R. Axel,et al.  A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition , 1991, Cell.

[4]  J. J. Hopfield,et al.  Pattern recognition computation using action potential timing for stimulus representation , 1995, Nature.

[5]  S. Ullman.  The Interpretation of Visual Motion , 1979 .

[6]  L. R. Rabiner,et al.  An introduction to the application of the theory of probabilistic functions of a Markov process to automatic speech recognition , 1983, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[7]  T D Albright,et al.  Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. , 1992, Science.

[8]  K. P. Unnikrishnan,et al.  Speaker-Independent Digit Recognition Using a Neural Network with Time-Delayed Connections , 1992, Neural Computation.

[9]  Richard L. Doty,et al.  An examination of relationships between the pleasantness, intensity, and concentration of 10 odorous stimuli , 1975 .

[10]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Olfactory computation and object perception. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  John J. Hopfield,et al.  Connected-digit speaker-dependent speech recognition using a neural network with time-delayed connections , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[12]  L. Buck,et al.  Information coding in the vertebrate olfactory system. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  Mary L. Harbold.  Sound Generation in Winds, Strings, Computers , 1981 .

[14]  Alan Gelperin,et al.  Differential conditioning to a compound stimulus and its components in the terrestrial mollusc Limax maximus.. , 1989 .

[15]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural computation by concentrating information in time. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Peter Wright,et al.  Taste, olfaction, and the central nervous system: A Festschrift Honouring Carl Pfaffmann. Edited by Donald Pfaff. Rockefeller University Press, New York, 1985. $29.95. , 1986 .

[17]  J. Dickman,et al.  Taste, olfaction, and the central nervous system. A festschrift in honor of Carl Pfaffmann. Donald Pfaff, Ed. New York: Rockefeller University Press, 1985 , 1986 .