Bilateral energy transfer in delayed teleoperation on the time domain

The time domain passivity framework is attracting interest as a method for granting stability in both telerobotics and haptic contexts; this paper employs this approach in order to introduce a novel concept, the Bilateral Energy Transfer for haptic telepresence. Loosely speaking, the Bilateral Energy Transfer is the straightforward transfer of energy between the two opposite sides of a teleoperation network, the master and slave robots. In an ideal telepresence scenario master and slave robots behave as rigid connected masses [1], and their power exchange is lossless; conversely, realistic scenarios include sources of energy leaks, i.e. elements that modify the power flows in the network. Moreover, if energy leaks have an active nature, they become source of instability for the system. This work isolates two sources of instability normally present in a teleoperation system, i.e. the delayed communication channel and robot velocity estimation based on digital position acquisition. These energy leaks are counterbalanced by two independent controllers, whose design is based on energetic consideration, and whose employment allows to achieve the Bilateral Energy Transfer. The presented arguments are sustained by simulations and experiments.

[1]  Jordi Villanova i Buxó Time Domain Passivity-based Telepresence with Time Delay , 2005 .

[2]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay , 1988, Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Sampled- and continuous-time passivity and stability of virtual environments , 2004, IEEE Trans. Robotics.

[4]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Time domain passivity for delayed haptic telepresence with energy reference , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Bilateral control of master-slave manipulators for ideal kinesthetic coupling-formulation and experiment , 1994, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[6]  Alessandro Macchelli,et al.  Simulation Issues in Haptics , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Time domain passivity control of haptic interfaces , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[8]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  Günter Dieter Niemeyer,et al.  Using wave variables in time delayed force reflecting teleoperation , 1996 .

[10]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Sampled- and continuous-time passivity and stability of virtual environments , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[11]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Time domain passivity control with reference energy behavior , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[12]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Effects of position quantization and sampling rate on virtual-wall passivity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Control of Interactive Robotic Interfaces: A Port-Hamiltonian Approach (Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics) , 2007 .