From Bad to Good: Fitness Reversals and the Ascent of Deleterious Mutations

Deleterious mutations are considered a major impediment to adaptation, and there are straightforward expectations for the rate at which they accumulate as a function of population size and mutation rate. In a simulation model of an evolving population of asexually replicating RNA molecules, initially deleterious mutations accumulated at rates nearly equal to that of initially beneficial mutations, without impeding evolutionary progress. As the mutation rate was increased within a moderate range, deleterious mutation accumulation and mean fitness improvement both increased. The fixation rates were higher than predicted by many population-genetic models. This seemingly paradoxical result was resolved in part by the observation that, during the time to fixation, the selection coefficient (s) of initially deleterious mutations reversed to confer a selective advantage. Significantly, more than half of the fixations of initially deleterious mutations involved fitness reversals. These fitness reversals had a substantial effect on the total fitness of the genome and thus contributed to its success in the population. Despite the relative importance of fitness reversals, however, the probabilities of fixation for both initially beneficial and initially deleterious mutations were exceedingly small (on the order of 10−5 of all mutations).

[1]  W. Stephan,et al.  Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation. , 2000, Genetics.

[2]  Walter Fontana,et al.  Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures , 1994 .

[3]  L. Chao,et al.  Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6. , 1999, Genetics.

[4]  J. Drake,et al.  Mutation rates among RNA viruses. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  L. Chao,et al.  The Coupon Collector and the Suppressor Mutation , 2005, Genetics.

[6]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations , 2004, Genetica.

[7]  M. Kimura The role of compensatory neutral mutations in molecular evolution , 1985, Journal of Genetics.

[8]  P. Feldman Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[9]  T. Johnson,et al.  The effect of deleterious alleles on adaptation in asexual populations. , 2002, Genetics.

[10]  C. Wilke,et al.  Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  J. Peck A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. , 1994, Genetics.

[12]  Stephen P. Miller,et al.  The Biochemical Architecture of an Ancient Adaptive Landscape , 2005, Science.

[13]  P. Schuster,et al.  A computer model of evolutionary optimization. , 1987, Biophysical chemistry.

[14]  Christina L. Burch,et al.  Epistasis and Its Relationship to Canalization in the RNA Virus φ6 , 2004, Genetics.

[15]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Genome Size: Does Bigger Mean Worse? , 2004, Current Biology.

[16]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  S. Sunyaev,et al.  Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibilities in protein evolution , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Nigel F. Delaney,et al.  Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins , 2006, Science.

[19]  Michael Lachmann,et al.  Quasispecies Made Simple , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  M. Zuker On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA molecule. , 1989, Science.

[21]  P. Schuster,et al.  IR-98-039 / April Continuity in Evolution : On the Nature of Transitions , 1998 .

[22]  Art Poon,et al.  The Rate of Compensatory Mutation in the DNA Bacteriophage φX174 , 2005, Genetics.

[23]  D. Hartl,et al.  Compensated Deleterious Mutations in Insect Genomes , 2004, Science.

[24]  R. Watson,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: SIGN EPISTASIS AND GENETIC COSTRAINT ON EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  Motoo Kimura,et al.  Some Problems of Stochastic Processes in Genetics , 1957 .

[26]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The rate of adaptation in asexuals. , 2000, Genetics.

[28]  W. Fontana,et al.  Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in RNA. , 2000, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[29]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[30]  ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION OF ASEXUAL POPULATIONS UNDER MULLER'S RATCHET , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  Robert T. Pennock,et al.  The evolutionary origin of complex features , 2003, Nature.

[32]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Fast algorithm for predicting the secondary structure of single-stranded RNA. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  T. Johnson Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations. , 1999, Genetics.

[34]  M. Eigen Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules , 1971, Naturwissenschaften.

[35]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[36]  J. Doudna Structural genomics of RNA , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[37]  Michael Zuker,et al.  Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information , 1981, Nucleic Acids Res..

[38]  M. Kimura,et al.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. , 1962, Genetics.

[39]  P. Schuster,et al.  Complete suboptimal folding of RNA and the stability of secondary structures. , 1999, Biopolymers.

[40]  R. Lenski,et al.  Pervasive compensatory adaptation in Escherichia coli , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  W. Stephan,et al.  Distinguishing the hitchhiking and background selection models. , 2003, Genetics.

[42]  J. Bull,et al.  Distributions of Beneficial Fitness Effects in RNA , 2005, Genetics.

[43]  D. Weinreich,et al.  RAPID EVOLUTIONARY ESCAPE BY LARGE POPULATIONS FROM LOCAL FITNESS PEAKS IS LIKELY IN NATURE , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  Andrew D. Ellington,et al.  The Robustness of Naturally and Artificially Selected Nucleic Acid Secondary Structures , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.