Inferring an ELECTRE TRI Model from Assignment Examples

Given a finite set of alternatives, the sorting problem consists in the assignment of each alternative to one of the pre-defined categories. In this paper, we are interested in multiple criteria sorting problems and, more precisely, in the existing method ELECTRE TRI. This method requires the elicitation of parameters (weights, thresholds, category limits,...) in order to construct the Decision Maker's (DM) preference model. A direct elicitation of these parameters being rather difficult, we proceed to solve this problem in a way that requires from the DM much less cognitive effort. We elicit these parameters indirectly using holistic information given by the DM through assignment examples. We propose an interactive approach that infers the parameters of an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. The determination of an ELECTRE TRI model that best restitutes the assignment examples is formulated through an optimization problem. The interactive aspect of this approach lies in the possibility given to the DM to revise his/her assignment examples and/or to give additional information before the optimization phase restarts.

[1]  J. March Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[2]  Sholom M. Weiss,et al.  Computer Systems That Learn , 1990 .

[3]  William Emmanuel S. Yu,et al.  Aide multicritere a la decision dans le cadre de la problematique du tri , 1992 .

[4]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  LERS-A System for Learning from Examples Based on Rough Sets , 1992, Intelligent Decision Support.

[5]  Z. Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic algorithms for numerical optimization , 1991 .

[6]  Roman Słowiński,et al.  Intelligent Decision Support , 1992, Theory and Decision Library.

[7]  Vincent Mousseau,et al.  Eliciting Information Concerning the Relative Importance of Criteria , 1995 .

[8]  R. Słowiński,et al.  Molp with an interactive assessment of a piecewise linear utility function , 1987 .

[9]  J. Siskos Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making , 1982 .

[10]  Z. Pawlak,et al.  Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis , 1994 .

[11]  P. Vincke,et al.  Relational Systems of Preference with One or More Pseudo-Criteria: Some New Concepts and Results , 1984 .

[12]  Eric Jacquet-Lagrèze,et al.  Interactive Assessment of Preferences Using Holistic Judgments the Prefcalc System , 1990 .

[13]  Stephen I. Gallant,et al.  Neural network learning and expert systems , 1993 .

[14]  R. Słowiński Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory , 1992 .

[15]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas , 1993 .

[16]  Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.  A theory and methodology of inductive learning , 1993 .

[17]  Vincent Mousseau Problèmes liés à l'évaluation de l'importance relative des critères en aide multicritère à la décision : réflexions théoriques, expérimentations et implémentations informatiques , 1993 .

[18]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Main sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision in decision models , 1989 .