Measuring Similarity between Flamenco Rhythmic Patterns

Abstract Music similarity underlies a large part of a listener's experience, as it relates to familiarity and associations between different pieces or parts. Rhythmic similarity has received scant research attention in comparison with other aspects of music similarity such as melody or harmony. Mathematical measures of rhythmic similarity have been proposed, but none of them has been compared to human judgments. We present a first study consisting of two listening tests conducted to compare two mathematical similarity measures, the chronotonic distance and the directed swap distance, to perceptual measures of similarity. In order to investigate the effect of expertise on the perception of rhythmic similarity, we contrasted three groups of participants, namely non-musicians, classically trained percussionists and flamenco musicians. Results are presented in terms of statistical analysis of the raw ratings, phylogenetic analysis of the dissimilarity matrices, correlation with mathematical measures and qualitative analysis of spontaneous verbal descriptions reported by participants. A main effect of expertise was observed on the raw ratings, but not on the dissimilarity matrices. No effect of tempo was observed. Results of both listening tests converge to show that the directed-swap distance best matches human judgments of similarity regardless of expertise. The analysis of verbal descriptions indicates that novice listeners focused on ‘surface’ features, while musicians focused on the underlying rhythmic structure and used more specialized vocabulary.

[1]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  A Generative Theory of Tonal Music , 1985 .

[2]  Jonathan Foote,et al.  Audio Retrieval by Rhythmic Similarity , 2002, ISMIR.

[3]  Yves Van de Peer,et al.  zt: A Sofware Tool for Simple and Partial Mantel Tests , 2002 .

[4]  Godfried T. Toussaint,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Formal Measures of rhythmic Syncopation , 2007, ICMC.

[5]  Michael Droettboom,et al.  ISMIR 2004: International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, October 10-14, 2004, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain , 2004 .

[6]  Godfried T. Toussaint,et al.  Similaridad y evolución en la rítmica del flamenco: una incursión de la matemática computacional , 2005 .

[7]  Henkjan Honing,et al.  Structure and interpretation of rhythm and timing , 2002 .

[8]  D. Huson,et al.  Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  V. Moulton,et al.  Neighbor-net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  A. Gabrielsson,et al.  Similarity ratings and dimension analyses of auditory rhythm patterns. I. , 1973, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[11]  Robert A. Duke When Tempo Changes Rhythm: The Effect of Tempo on Nonmusicians' Perception of Rhythm , 1994 .

[12]  N. Mantel The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[13]  Godfried T. Toussaint,et al.  A Comparison of Rhythmic Similarity Measures , 2004, ISMIR.

[14]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[15]  Eleanor Selfridge-Field,et al.  Melodic Similarity : concepts, procedures, and applications , 1998 .