FAUST: Dataset and Evaluation for 3D Mesh Registration

New scanning technologies are increasing the importance of 3D mesh data and the need for algorithms that can reliably align it. Surface registration is important for building full 3D models from partial scans, creating statistical shape models, shape retrieval, and tracking. The problem is particularly challenging for non-rigid and articulated objects like human bodies. While the challenges of real-world data registration are not present in existing synthetic datasets, establishing ground-truth correspondences for real 3D scans is difficult. We address this with a novel mesh registration technique that combines 3D shape and appearance information to produce high-quality alignments. We define a new dataset called FAUST that contains 300 scans of 10 people in a wide range of poses together with an evaluation methodology. To achieve accurate registration, we paint the subjects with high-frequency textures and use an extensive validation process to ensure accurate ground truth. We find that current shape registration methods have trouble with this real-world data. The dataset and evaluation website are available for research purposes at http://faust.is.tue.mpg.de.

[1]  Thomas A. Funkhouser,et al.  Möbius voting for surface correspondence , 2009, ACM Trans. Graph..

[2]  Zoran Popovic,et al.  The space of human body shapes: reconstruction and parameterization from range scans , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[3]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  A Survey on Shape Correspondence , 2011, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[4]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  The Correlated Correspondence Algorithm for Unsupervised Registration of Nonrigid Surfaces , 2004, NIPS.

[5]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  SCAPE: shape completion and animation of people , 2005, SIGGRAPH '05.

[6]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  SHREC 2010: robust correspondence benchmark , 2010 .

[7]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Shining a Light on Human Pose: On Shadows, Shading and the Estimation of Pose and Shape , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[8]  Michael J. Black,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of Current Practices in Optical Flow Estimation and the Principles Behind Them , 2013, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Robust single-view geometry and motion reconstruction , 2009, ACM Trans. Graph..

[10]  Vladimir G. Kim,et al.  Blended intrinsic maps , 2011, ACM Trans. Graph..

[11]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Coregistration: Simultaneous Alignment and Modeling of Articulated 3D Shape , 2012, ECCV.

[12]  Alexander M. Bronstein,et al.  Numerical Geometry of Non-Rigid Shapes , 2009, Monographs in Computer Science.

[13]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  A Survey on Shape Correspondence , 2011, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[14]  Zicheng Liu,et al.  Tensor-Based Human Body Modeling , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  One Point Isometric Matching with the Heat Kernel , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[16]  Chang Shu,et al.  Human shape correspondence with automatically predicted landmarks , 2011, Machine Vision and Applications.

[17]  Jan Kautz,et al.  Precomputed radiance transfer for real-time rendering in dynamic, low-frequency lighting environments , 2002 .

[18]  Ron Kimmel,et al.  Generalized multidimensional scaling: A framework for isometry-invariant partial surface matching , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Kathleen M. Robinette,et al.  The CAESAR project: a 3-D surface anthropometry survey , 1999, Second International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (Cat. No.PR00062).

[20]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  A Statistical Model of Human Pose and Body Shape , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[21]  Matthew Turk,et al.  A Morphable Model For The Synthesis Of 3D Faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.