On the synchrony of empirical mode decompositions with application to electroencephalography

A novel approach to measure the interdependence of time series is proposed, based on the alignment ("matching") of their Huang-Hilbert spectra. The method consists of three steps: first, empirical modes are extracted from the signals; those functions carry non-linear and non-stationary components in frequency limited bands. Second, the empirical modes are Hilbert transformed, resulting in very sharply localized ridges in the time- frequency plane; the obtained time-frequency representations are known as Huang-Hilbert spectra. At last, the latter are pairwise aligned by means of the stochastic-event synchrony method (SES), a recently proposed procedure to match pairs of multi-dimensional point processes. The level of similarity of two Huang-Hilbert spectra is quantified by three parameters: timing and frequency jitter of coincident ridges, and fraction of non-coincident ridges. The proposed method is used to detect steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP) in electroencephalography (EEG) signals; numerical results indicate that the method is vastly more sensitive to SSVEP than classical synchrony measures, and therefore, it may prove to be useful in applications such as brain-computer interfaces. Although the paper mostly deals with EEG, the presented synchrony measure may also be applied to other kinds of time series.

[1]  S. Hahn Hilbert Transforms in Signal Processing , 1996 .

[2]  Rémi Gervais,et al.  A machine learning approach to the analysis of time-frequency maps, and its application to neural dynamics , 2007, Neural Networks.

[3]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Measuring Neural Synchrony by Message Passing , 2007, NIPS.

[4]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Information Fusion for Perceptual Feedback: A Brain Activity Sonification Approach , 2008 .

[5]  Ramesh Srinivasan,et al.  MEG phase follows conscious perception during binocular rivalry induced by visual stream segregation. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  C. Stam,et al.  Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: Review of an emerging field , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Toshihisa Tanaka,et al.  Signal Processing Techniques for Knowledge Extraction and Information Fusion , 2008 .

[10]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[11]  Gabriel Rilling,et al.  On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms , 2003 .

[12]  Elly Gysels Phase synchronization for classification of spontaneous EEG signals in brain-computer interfaces , 2005 .

[13]  Hualou Liang,et al.  Causal influence: advances in neurosignal analysis. , 2005, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[14]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Steady state visual evoked potentials in the alert primate , 1982, Vision Research.