A novel signal-processing strategy for hearing-aid design: neurocompensation

A novel approach to hearing-aid signal processing is described, which attempts to re-establish a normal neural representation in the sensorineural impaired auditory system. Most hearing-aid fitting procedures are based on heuristics or some initial qualitative theory. These theories, such as loudness normalization, loudness equalization or maximal intelligibility can give vastly different results for a given individual, and each may provide variable results for different hearing impaired individuals with the same audiogram. Recent research in characterizing sensorineural hearing loss has delineated the importance of hair cell damage in understanding the bulk of sensorineural hearing impairments. A novel methodology based on restoring normal neural representation after the sensorineural impairment is presented here. This approach can be used for designing hearing-aid signal processing algorithms, as well as providing a general, automated means of predicting the relative intelligibility of a given speech sample in normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects.

[1]  P. Newall,et al.  Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[2]  T Houtgast,et al.  A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Renato Nobili,et al.  How well do we understand the cochlea? , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  D Byrne,et al.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Alejandro Bia.  Alopex-B: A New, Simpler, But Yet Faster Version Of The Alopex Training Algorithm , 2001, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[6]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of spontaneous discharge rates , 1984, Hearing Research.

[7]  Denis Byrne,et al.  Evaluation of Hearing Aid Fittings for Infants , 1974 .

[8]  D. Brooks,et al.  Gain Requirements of Hearing aid Users , 1973 .

[9]  H.J.M. Steeneken,et al.  On measuring and predicting speech intelligibility , 1992 .

[10]  Ian C. Bruce,et al.  Auditory nerve model for predicting performance limits of normal and impaired listeners , 2001 .

[11]  B C Moore,et al.  Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  David V. Anderson,et al.  Application of a human auditory model to loudness perception and hearing compensation , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[13]  B. Moore,et al.  A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea , 2000, British journal of audiology.

[14]  Christine M. Rankovic.  An Application of the Articulation Index to Hearing Aid Fitting , 1991 .

[15]  C M Rankovic,et al.  An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  F N Martin,et al.  Seventh survey of audiometric practices in the United States. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  J M Kates.  Toward a theory of optimal hearing aid processing. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  M. Sachs,et al.  An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  David V. Anderson,et al.  Evaluation of a hearing compensation algorithm , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[20]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Predicting Speech Intelligibility from a Population of Neurons , 2003, NIPS.

[21]  B. Moore.  Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage , 1995 .

[22]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[23]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural Sound Statistics and Divisive Normalization in the Auditory System , 2000, NIPS.

[24]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves , 1984, Hearing Research.

[25]  K. P. Unnikrishnan,et al.  Alopex: A Correlation-Based Learning Algorithm for Feedforward and Recurrent Neural Networks , 1994, Neural Computation.

[26]  T. Duke,et al.  Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D A Fabry,et al.  Evaluation of an articulation-index based model for predicting the effects of adaptive frequency response hearing aids. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[28]  David V. Anderson,et al.  Model Based Development Of A Hearing Aid , 1994 .

[29]  G Keidser,et al.  NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[30]  Diana Binnenpoorte,et al.  The IFA corpus: a phonemically segmented dutch "open source" speech database , 2001, INTERSPEECH.

[31]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[32]  L. Carney,et al.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  T Houtgast,et al.  Effects of degradation of intensity, time, or frequency content on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[35]  Francis M. Wiener,et al.  The Pressure Distribution in the Auditory Canal in a Progressive Sound Field , 1946 .

[36]  Jos J Eggermont,et al.  Moderate noise trauma in juvenile cats results in profound cortical topographic map changes in adulthood , 2000, Hearing Research.