Asymptotic locally optimal detector for large-scale sensor networks under Poisson regime

We consider the distributed detection problem with a large number if identical sensors deployed over a region where the phenomenon of interest (POI) has different signal strength depending on the location. Each sensor makes a decision based on its own measurement of the spatially varying signal and the local decision of each sensor is sent to a fusion center through a multiple access channel. The fusion center decides whether the POI has occurred in the region, under a global size constraint in the Neyman-Pearson formulation. Assuming that the initial distribution of sensors is a homogeneous spatial Poisson process, we show that the Poisson process of 'alarmed' sensors satisfies the locally asymptotic normality (LAN) condition as the number of sensor goes to infinity and derive a new asymptotically locally most powerful detector for the spatially varying signal. We show that (1) an optimal test statistic is a weighted sum of local decisions, (2) the optimal weight function is the shape of the spatial signal, and (3) the exact value of the spatial signal is not required. For the case of independent, identical distributed (i.i.d.) sensor observation, we show that the counting-based detector is also asymptotic locally optimal.

[1]  Po-Ning Chen,et al.  New asymptotic results in parallel distributed detection , 1993, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  Jack Capon,et al.  On the asmptotic efficiency of locally optimum detectors , 1961, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  R. Viswanathan,et al.  On counting rules in distributed detection , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[4]  John B. Thomas,et al.  Dead‐zone limiter: An application of conditional tests in nonparametric detection , 1976 .

[5]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  Distributed detection with multiple sensors I. Advanced topics , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[6]  Luigi Paura,et al.  Optimum and Suboptimum Space-Diversity Detection of Weak Signals in Non-Gaussian Noise , 1984, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  Friedrich Liese,et al.  Contiguity and LAN-property of sequences of Poisson processes , 1999, Kybernetika.

[8]  Ramanarayanan Viswanathan,et al.  Optimal distributed decision fusion , 1989 .

[9]  Israel Bar-David,et al.  Communication under the Poisson regime , 1969, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Alan F. Karr,et al.  Point Processes and Their Statistical Inference , 1991 .

[11]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Asymptotic locally optimal detector for large-scale sensor networks under the Poisson regime , 2005, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[12]  A. V. D. Vaart,et al.  Asymptotic Statistics: Frontmatter , 1998 .

[13]  Peter Breeze,et al.  Point Processes and Their Statistical Inference , 1991 .

[14]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed detection with multiple sensors I. Fundamentals , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[15]  G. Shedler,et al.  Simulation of Nonhomogeneous Poisson Processes by Thinning , 1979 .

[16]  Lang Tong,et al.  Sensor networks with mobile agents , 2003, IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2003. MILCOM 2003..

[17]  P.K. Varshney,et al.  Optimal Data Fusion in Multiple Sensor Detection Systems , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[18]  Donald L. Snyder,et al.  Random Point Processes in Time and Space , 1991 .

[19]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Decentralized detection by a large number of sensors , 1988, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[20]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[21]  George G. Roussas,et al.  Contiguity of probability measures: some applications in statistics: Preface , 1972 .

[22]  Y. Kutoyants,et al.  Statistical Inference for Spatial Poisson Processes , 1998 .

[23]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An introduction to signal detection and estimation (2nd ed.) , 1994 .

[24]  T. N. Sriram Asymptotics in Statistics–Some Basic Concepts , 2002 .

[25]  R. Viswanathan,et al.  Multilevel quantisation and fusion scheme for the decentralised detection of an unknown signal , 1994 .

[26]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Decentralized detection in sensor networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[27]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  Distributed signal detection under the Neyman-Pearson criterion , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[28]  Nils Sandell,et al.  Detection with Distributed Sensors , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.