Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function.

One of the primary factors determining how proteins interact with other molecules is the size of clefts in the protein's surface. In enzymes, for example, the active site is often characterized by a particularly large and deep cleft, while interactions between the molecules of a protein dimer tend to involve approximately planar surfaces. Here we present an analysis of how cleft volumes in proteins relate to their molecular interactions and functions. Three separate datasets are used, representing enzyme-ligand binding, protein-protein dimerization and antibody-antigen complexes. We find that, in single-chain enzymes, the ligand is bound in the largest cleft in over 83% of the proteins. Usually the largest cleft is considerably larger than the others, suggesting that size is a functional requirement. Thus, in many cases, the likely active sites of an enzyme can be identified using purely geometrical criteria alone. In other cases, where there is no predominantly large cleft, chemical interactions are required for pinpointing the correct location. In antibody-antigen interactions the antibody usually presents a large cleft for antigen binding. In contrast, protein-protein interactions in homodimers are characterized by approximately planar interfaces with several clefts involved. However, the largest cleft in each subunit still tends to be involved.

[1]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  T. Steitz,et al.  Space-filling models of kinase clefts and conformation changes. , 1979, Science.

[3]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  M. L. Connolly Analytical molecular surface calculation , 1983 .

[5]  B Honig,et al.  Internal cavities and buried waters in globular proteins. , 1986, Biochemistry.

[6]  H M Holden,et al.  Slow- and fast-binding inhibitors of thermolysin display different modes of binding: crystallographic analysis of extended phosphonamidate transition-state analogues. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[7]  Protein surface analysis: qualitative approach using B-spline functions and quantitative comparison , 1988 .

[8]  E. Fluder,et al.  Structure of human neutrophil elastase in complex with a peptide chloromethyl ketone inhibitor at 1.84-A resolution. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Y. Satow,et al.  Structure of ribonuclease H phased at 2 A resolution by MAD analysis of the selenomethionyl protein. , 1990, Science.

[10]  N. Colloc'h,et al.  A new tool for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of protein surfaces using B-spline and density of surface neighborhood. , 1990, Journal of molecular graphics.

[11]  Chris M. W. Ho,et al.  Cavity search: An algorithm for the isolation and display of cavity-like binding regions , 1990, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[12]  W. Weis,et al.  Structure of the calcium-dependent lectin domain from a rat mannose-binding protein determined by MAD phasing. , 1991, Science.

[13]  R. Lewis Clefts and binding sites in protein receptors. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[14]  L. Johnson,et al.  Glycogen phosphorylase: control by phosphorylation and allosteric effectors , 1992, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[15]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Crystal structure of the phosphotyrosine recognition domain SH2 of v-src complexed with tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides , 1993, Nature.

[16]  D. Levitt,et al.  POCKET: a computer graphics method for identifying and displaying protein cavities and their surrounding amino acids. , 1992, Journal of molecular graphics.

[17]  J. Delaney Finding and filling protein cavities using cellular logic operations. , 1992, Journal of Molecular Graphics.

[18]  D. Christianson,et al.  Structural comparison of sulfodiimine and sulfonamide inhibitors in their complexes with zinc enzymes. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  C. Stout,et al.  Crystal structures of aconitase with isocitrate and nitroisocitrate bound. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[20]  B. Wallace,et al.  The pore dimensions of gramicidin A. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[21]  F A Quiocho,et al.  A pre-transition-state mimic of an enzyme: X-ray structure of adenosine deaminase with bound 1-deazaadenosine and zinc-activated water. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[22]  T. P. Flores,et al.  Identification and classification of protein fold families. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[23]  G. Schulz,et al.  NADH binding site and catalysis of NADH peroxidase. , 1993, European journal of biochemistry.

[24]  G J Kleywegt,et al.  Detection, delineation, measurement and display of cavities in macromolecular structures. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[25]  D. Covell,et al.  A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein‐protein recognition , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  C. Grubmeyer,et al.  Crystal structure of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[27]  J. Thornton,et al.  Buried waters and internal cavities in monomeric proteins , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  R. Laskowski SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. , 1995, Journal of molecular graphics.

[29]  J M Thornton,et al.  Protein-protein interactions: a review of protein dimer structures. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[30]  M B Swindells,et al.  A procedure for detecting structural domains in proteins , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[31]  C. Frömmel,et al.  The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.