Shape metrics, warping and statistics

Approximations of shape metrics, such as the Hausdorff distance, to define similarity measures between shapes are proposed. Our approximations being continuous and differentiable, they provide an obvious way to warp a shape onto another by solving a partial differential equation (PDE), in effect a curve flow, obtained from their first order variation. This first order variation defines a normal deformation field for a given curve. We use the normal deformation fields induced by several sample shape examples to define their mean, their covariance "operator", and the principal modes of variation. Our theory, which can be seen as a nonlinear generalization of the linear approaches proposed by several authors, is illustrated with numerous examples. Our approach being based upon the use of distance functions is characterized by the fact that it is intrinsic, i.e. independent of the shape parametrization.

[1]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Reconciling Distance Functions and Level Sets , 1999, Scale-Space.

[2]  Paul Dupuis,et al.  Variational problems on ows of di eomorphisms for image matching , 1998 .

[3]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Diffeomorphisms Groups and Pattern Matching in Image Analysis , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  Michael Isard,et al.  Active Contours , 2000, Springer London.

[5]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[6]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Diffeomorphic Matching Problems in One Dimension: Designing and Minimizing Matching Functionals , 2000, ECCV.

[7]  Laurent Younes,et al.  Computable Elastic Distances Between Shapes , 1998, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[8]  Olivier Faugeras,et al.  Reconciling Distance Functions and Level Sets , 2000, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[9]  F. Bookstein Size and Shape Spaces for Landmark Data in Two Dimensions , 1986 .

[10]  T. K. Carne The Geometry of Shape Spaces , 1990 .

[11]  D. Kendall A Survey of the Statistical Theory of Shape , 1989 .

[12]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Group Actions, Homeomorphisms, and Matching: A General Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Laurent Younes,et al.  Optimal matching between shapes via elastic deformations , 1999, Image Vis. Comput..

[14]  Ulf Grenander,et al.  Hands: A Pattern Theoretic Study of Biological Shapes , 1990 .

[15]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  The role of image registration in brain mapping , 2001, Image Vis. Comput..

[16]  Stefano Soatto,et al.  DEFORMOTION: Deforming Motion, Shape Average and the Joint Registration and Segmentation of Images , 2002, ECCV.

[17]  D. Kendall SHAPE MANIFOLDS, PROCRUSTEAN METRICS, AND COMPLEX PROJECTIVE SPACES , 1984 .

[18]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Analysis of Planar Shapes Using Geodesic Lengths on a Shape Manifold , 2002 .

[19]  G. Matheron Random Sets and Integral Geometry , 1976 .

[20]  U. Grenander,et al.  Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline , 1998 .

[21]  Marko Subasic,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods , 2003 .

[22]  James A. Sethian,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods , 1999 .

[23]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..