Neural processing of stereopsis as a function of viewing distance in primate visual cortical area V1

1. The influence of viewing distance on disparity selectivity was investigated in area V1 of behaving monkeys. While the animals performed a fixation task, cortical cells were recorded extracellularly in the foveal representation of the visual field. Disparity selectivity was assessed by using static random dot stereograms (RDSs) through red/green filters flashed over the central fixation target. To determine the influence of the viewing distance, a color video monitor was positioned at fixed distances of 20, 40, or 80 cm. The same RDSs with the same angular size of dots were used at the three distances. 2. Disparity sensitivity was tested on 139 cells, of which 78 were analyzed at two or more distances and the rest (61) at a single distance. When disparity selectivity was analyzed at a given distance, about half the cells were found to be selective at 40 or 80 cm, but only a third at 20 cm. Near cells were > or = 1.5 times more common than far cells at all three distances. The latency distribution of the responses of disparity-selective (DS) cells was similar at all three distances, with a mean distribution centered around 60 ms. 3. Changing the viewing distance drastically affected the neural activity of the V1 neurons. The visual responsiveness of 60 of 78 cells (77%) was significantly changed. Disparity selectivity could be present at a given distance and absent at other(s), with often a loss of visual response. This emergence of disparity coding was the strongest effect (28 of 78 or 36%) and occurred more frequently from short to long distances. Among the cells that remained disparity insensitive at all recorded distances (31 of 78 or 40%), about half also showed modulations of the amplitude of the visual response. For cells that remained DS at all recorded distances (13 of 78 or 17%), changing the viewing distance also affected the sharpness (or magnitude) of disparity coding in terms of level of visual responsiveness and those changes were often combined with variations in tuning width. In only two cells did the peak of selectivity type change. Finally, the activity of four DS cells was not affected at all by the viewing distance. 4. Another effect concerned the level of ongoing activity (OA), defined as being the neural activity in darkness preceding the flash of the visual stimulus while the monkey was fixating the small bright target. Changing the viewing distance resulted in significant changes in OA level for more than half of the cells (41 of 78 or 53%). The most common effect was an increase in OA level at the shorter distance. The modulations of both visual responsiveness and OA could occur simultaneously, although they often had opposite signs. Indeed, the two effects were statistically independent of each other, i.e., modulations of visual responses were not related to the level of excitability of the neurons. 5. Control experiments were performed that showed that the effects of changing the viewing distance were not due to the retinal patterns in that the modulations of visual responsiveness were independent of the dot density. Seventeen cells were also tested for a possible effect of vergence by the use of prisms. When there was an effect of distance, it could be closely or partially reproduced by using prisms. These controls, together with the effects observed on OA, strongly suggest that the modulations of neural activity of the V1 neurons by the viewing distance are extraretinal in origin, probably proprioceptive. 6. The modulation of visual responsiveness by the viewing distance in the primary visual cortex indicates that integration of information from both retinal and extraretinal sources can occur early in the visual processing pathway for cortical representation of three-dimensional space. A functional scheme of three-dimensional cortical circuitry is discussed that shows cortical areas where disparity selectivity and modulations of visual activity by the angle of gaze have been described so far.

[1]  H. Wallach,et al.  The constancy of stereoscopic depth. , 1963, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  R H Wurtz,et al.  Comparison of effects of eye movements and stimulus movements on striate cortex neurons of the monkey. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  C. Blakemore Binocular depth discrimination and the nasotemporal division , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Binocular interaction fields of single units in the cat striate cortex , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  C. Hofsten,et al.  The role of convergence in visual space perception , 1976, Vision Research.

[7]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  Binocular visual mechanisms in cortical areas I and II of the sheep. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  M. Ritter,et al.  Effect of disparity and viewing distance on perceived depth , 1977 .

[9]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J. M. Foley Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[11]  H. Sakata,et al.  Spatial properties of visual fixation neurons in posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Ferster A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  J Mayhew,et al.  The Interpretation of Stereo-Disparity Information: The Computation of Surface Orientation and Depth , 1982, Perception.

[14]  J. E. W. Mayhew,et al.  A computational model of binocular depth perception , 1982, Nature.

[15]  D. Bouis,et al.  An accurate and linear infrared oculometer , 1983, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  R. Andersen,et al.  The influence of the angle of gaze upon the excitability of the light- sensitive neurons of the posterior parietal cortex , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  T. Whiteside,et al.  Binocular Cues in the Perception of Distance of a Point Source of Light , 1984, Perception.

[19]  K Toyama,et al.  Integration of retinal and motor signals of eye movements in striate cortex cells of the alert cat. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Binocular simple cells for local stereopsis: Comparison of receptive field organizations for the two eyes , 1984, Vision Research.

[21]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms , 1985, Vision Research.

[22]  T. L. Harrington,et al.  Neural mechanisms of space vision in the parietal association cortex of the monkey , 1985, Vision Research.

[23]  M. Wagner,et al.  The metric of visual space , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  S Yamane,et al.  Stereoscopic mechanisms: binocular responses of the striate cells of cats to moving light and dark bars , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[25]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Receptive field properties of neurons in area V3 of macaque monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Y Trotter,et al.  Role of extraocular muscle proprioception in the development of depth perception in cats. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Y Trotter,et al.  The period of susceptibility of visual cortical binocularity to unilateral proprioceptive deafferentation of extraocular muscles. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  D. Snodderly,et al.  Studying striate cortex neurons in behaving monkeys: Benefits of image stabilization , 1987, Vision Research.

[29]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. II. Differentiation of retinal from extraretinal inputs. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  S. Levay,et al.  Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex , 1988, Visual Neuroscience.

[31]  C. Galletti,et al.  Gaze-dependent visual neurons in area V3A of monkey prestriate cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Lal,et al.  Gating of retinal transmission by afferent eye position and movement signals. , 1989, Science.

[33]  P O Bishop,et al.  Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: a new interpretation , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[34]  S. Celebrini,et al.  Neuronal stereoscopic processing following extraocular proprioception deafferentation. , 1990, NeuroReport.

[35]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  On the neurophysiological organization of binocular vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[36]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Eye position effects on visual, memory, and saccade-related activity in areas LIP and 7a of macaque , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  H Collewijn,et al.  Binocular eye movements and the perception of depth. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[38]  T S Collett,et al.  The Interaction of Oculomotor Cues and Stimulus Size in Stereoscopic Depth Constancy , 1991, Perception.

[39]  Y Trotter,et al.  Temporal limits of the susceptibility of depth perception to proprioceptive deafferentations of extraocular muscles. , 1991, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[40]  T. Collett,et al.  Does vertical disparity scale the perception of stereoscopic depth? , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  R. Andersen,et al.  Saccade-related activity in the lateral intraparietal area. I. Temporal properties; comparison with area 7a. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape , 1991, Nature.

[43]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  C. Galletti,et al.  Functional Properties of Neurons in the Anterior Bank of the Parieto‐occipital Sulcus of the Macaque Monkey , 1991, The European journal of neuroscience.

[45]  P. Thier,et al.  Responses of Visual‐Tracking Neurons from Cortical Area MST‐I to Visual, Eye and Head Motion , 1992, The European journal of neuroscience.

[46]  S Thorpe,et al.  Modulation of neural stereoscopic processing in primate area V1 by the viewing distance. , 1992, Science.

[47]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Disparity sensitivity of neurons in monkey extrastriate area MST , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[48]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Visual response latencies in striate cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  H. Sakata,et al.  Organization of space perception: neural representation of three-dimensional space in the posterior parietal cortex , 1992, Current Biology.

[50]  Y Trotter,et al.  Long-term dysfunctions of neural stereoscopic mechanisms after unilateral extraocular muscle proprioceptive deafferentation. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Carlos Acuña,et al.  Cell responses to vertical and horizontal retinal disparities in the monkey visual cortex , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[53]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Dynamics of orientation coding in area V1 of the awake primate , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[54]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Coordinate transformations in the representation of spatial information , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[55]  F. Krause,et al.  Binocular matching in monkey visual cortex: Single cell responses to correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random dot stereograms , 1993, Neuroscience.

[56]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis , 1993, Nature.

[57]  J. Malpeli,et al.  Responses of neurons in primary visual cortex are modulated by eye position. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  Jean-Louis Vercher,et al.  Changes in ocular alignment and pointing accuracy after sustained passive rotation of one eye , 1994, Vision Research.

[59]  D. Zee,et al.  Extraocular muscle proprioception functions in the control of ocular alignment and eye movement conjugacy. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[60]  J. Bullier,et al.  Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[61]  Gian F. Poggio Mechanisms of Stereopsis in Monkey Visual Cortex , 1995 .

[62]  J. Porrill,et al.  Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations , 1995, Vision Research.

[63]  Y Trotter,et al.  Cortical Representation of Visual Three-Dimensional Space , 1995, Perception.

[64]  L E Mays,et al.  Neurons in monkey parietal area LIP are tuned for eye-movement parameters in three-dimensional space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  C. Galletti,et al.  Eye Position Influence on the Parieto‐occipital Area PO (V6) of the Macaque Monkey , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[66]  P. Buisseret,et al.  Influence of extraocular muscle proprioception on vision. , 1995, Physiological reviews.

[67]  F A Miles,et al.  Short-latency disparity vergence responses and their dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  C. Galletti,et al.  Functional Demarcation of a Border Between Areas V6 and V6A in the Superior Parietal Gyrus of the Macaque Monkey , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[69]  B. Rogers,et al.  The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues , 1996, Vision Research.