Modeling Self-Organization in the Visual Cortex*

Publisher Summary This chapter talks about how the self-organizing map (SOM) architecture was originally motivated by the topological maps and the self-organization of sensory pathways in the brain. The standard SOM algorithm, where a global supervisor finds the maximally responding unit and determines the weight-change neighborhood, is a computationally powerful abstraction of the actual biological mechanisms. Such an abstraction has turned out extremely useful in many real-world tasks from visualization and data mining to robot control and optimization. To gain insight into biological knowledge organization and development, the self-organizing map architecture is extended with anatomical receptive fields, lateral connections, Hebbian adaptation, and spiking neurons. The resulting RF-SLISSOM model shows how the observed receptive fields, columnar organization, and lateral connectivity in the visual cortex can arise through input-driven self-organization, and how such plasticity can account for partial recovery following retinal and cortical lesions. The self-organized network forms a redundancy-reduced sparse coding of the input that allows it to process massive amounts of information efficiently, and explains how various low-level visual phenomena such as tilt aftereffects, and segmentation and binding can emerge. Such models allow understanding biological processes at a very detailed computational level, and are likely to play a major role in cognitive neuroscience in the future.

[1]  G. Blasdel,et al.  Orientation selectivity, preference, and continuity in monkey striate cortex , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Physiological interpretationm of the self-organizing map algorithm , 1993 .

[3]  David J. Field,et al.  What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding? , 1994, Neural Computation.

[4]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Lateral Connections In The Visual Cortex Can Self-Organize Cooperatively With Multisize RFs Just As With Ocular Dominance and Orientation Columns , 1996 .

[5]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  Large-scale simulations of self-organizing neural networks on parallel computers: application to biological modelling , 1990, Parallel Comput..

[6]  M E Bellemann,et al.  Functional MR imaging of semantic information processing and learning-related effects using psychometrically controlled stimulation paradigms. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Models of Orientation and Ocular Dominance Columns in the Visual Cortex: A Critical Comparison , 1995, Neural Computation.

[8]  G. Turrigiano Homeostatic plasticity in neuronal networks: the more things change, the more they stay the same , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Does the tilt after-effect occur in the oblique meridian? , 1976, Vision Research.

[10]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Self-organization and segmentation in a laterally connected orientation map of spiking neurons , 1998, Neurocomputing.

[11]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Orientation illusions and after-effects: Inhibition between channels , 1975, Vision Research.

[12]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  A Neural Network Model of Visual Tilt Aftereffects , 1997 .

[13]  R. Miikkulainen,et al.  Self-Organization, Plasticity, and Low-Level Visual Phenomena in a Laterally Connected Map Model of the Primary Visual Cortex , 1997 .

[14]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Topographic Receptive Fields and Patterned Lateral Interaction in a Self-Organizing Model of the Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, Neural Computation.

[15]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.