Learning to Integrate an Artificial Sensory Device: From Decision Fusion to Sensory Integration

The present study examines how artificial tactile stimulation from a novel non-invasive sensory device is learned and integrated with information from another sensory system. Participants were trained to identify the direction of visual dot motion stimuli with a low, medium, and high signal-to-noise ratio. In bimodal trials, this visual direction information was paired with reliable symbolic tactile information. Over several blocks of training, discrimination performance in unimodal tactile test trials improved, indicating that participants were able to associate the visual and tactile information and thus learned the meaning of the symbolic tactile cues. Formal analysis of the results in bimodal trials showed that the information from both modalities was integrated according to two different integration policies. Initially, participants seemed to rely on a linear decision integration policy based on the metacognitive experience of confidence. In later learning phases, however, our results are consistent with a Bayesian integration policy, that is, optimal integration of sensory information. Thus, the present study demonstrates that humans are capable of learning and integrating an artificial sensory device delivering symbolic tactile information. This finding connects the field of multisensory integration research to the development of sensory substitution systems.

[1]  Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Wearable Sensors for Human Activity Monitoring: A Review , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[2]  Joseph E O'Doherty,et al.  A learning–based approach to artificial sensory feedback leads to optimal integration , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Jennifer L. Campos,et al.  Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[4]  Jessica A. Cooper,et al.  Training attention improves decision making in individuals with elevated self-reported depressive symptoms , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  P. Dayan,et al.  Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans , 2006, Nature.

[6]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Optimal multisensory decision-making in a reaction-time task , 2014, eLife.

[7]  Jeffrey G. Ojemann,et al.  Ownership of an artificial limb induced by electrical brain stimulation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Uta Noppeney,et al.  Integration of audiovisual spatial signals is not consistent with maximum likelihood estimation , 2019, Cortex.

[9]  Dae-Hyeong Kim,et al.  Multifunctional wearable devices for diagnosis and therapy of movement disorders. , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[10]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Tuning the speed-accuracy trade-off to maximize reward rate in multisensory decision-making , 2015, eLife.

[11]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Prokar Dasgupta,et al.  A review of wearable technology in medicine , 2016, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[13]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[14]  Peter B. Shull,et al.  Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[16]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Softmax Decision-Making Models With Linear Objective Functions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[17]  Shachar Maidenbaum,et al.  EyeMusic: Introducing a "visual" colorful experience for the blind using auditory sensory substitution. , 2014, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[18]  Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,et al.  Multisensory Perception of Contradictory Information in an Environment of Varying Reliability: Evidence for Conscious Perception and Optimal Causal Inference , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Shachar Maidenbaum,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Sensory Substitution: Closing the Gap between Basic Research and Widespread Practical Visual Rehabilitation Author's Personal Copy , 2022 .

[20]  Peter J Bex,et al.  (In) sensitivity to spatial distortion in natural scenes. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[21]  A. Diederich,et al.  Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: Effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  A. Pouget,et al.  Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.