Locating object knowledge in the brain: comment on Bowers's (2009) attempt to revive the grandmother cell hypothesis.

According to Bowers, the finding that there are neurons with highly selective responses to familiar stimuli supports theories positing localist representations over approaches positing the type of distributed representations typically found in parallel distributed processing (PDP) models. However, his conclusions derive from an overly narrow view of the range of possible distributed representations and of the role that PDP models can play in exploring their properties. Although it is true that current distributed theories face challenges in accounting for both neural and behavioral data, the proposed localist account--to the extent that it is articulated at all--runs into more fundamental difficulties. Central to these difficulties is the problem of specifying the set of entities a localist unit represents.

[1]  R. Glushko The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[7]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Competitive Learning: From Interactive Activation to Adaptive Resonance , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[9]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[10]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  M. Young,et al.  Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. , 1992, Science.

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[14]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .

[15]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[16]  M. Page,et al.  Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain , 2000 .

[18]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Stipulating versus discovering representations , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[21]  D. Plaut,et al.  The impact of synaptic depression following brain damage: A connectionist account of “access/refractory” and “degraded-store” semantic impairments , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  C. Gross Genealogy of the “Grandmother Cell” , 2002, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. , 2004, Psychological review.

[24]  C. Koch,et al.  Sparse Representation in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Object category structure in response patterns of neuronal population in monkey inferior temporal cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Stefan Leutgeb,et al.  Pattern separation, pattern completion, and new neuronal codes within a continuous CA3 map. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[27]  C. Koch,et al.  Sparse but not ‘Grandmother-cell’ coding in the medial temporal lobe , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  H. Barlow,et al.  Single Units and Sensation: A Neuron Doctrine for Perceptual Psychology? , 1972, Perception.

[29]  James L. McClelland The Place of Modeling in Cognitive Science , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience. , 2009, Psychological review.

[31]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  More on grandmother cells and the biological implausibility of PDP models of cognition: a reply to Plaut and McClelland (2010) and Quian Quiroga and Kreiman (2010). , 2010, Psychological review.