Estimating the Number of Endmembers to Use in Spectral Unmixing of Hyperspectral Data with Collaborative Sparsity

Spectral Unmixing (SU) in hyperspectral remote sensing aims at recovering the signatures of the pure materials in the scene (endmembers) and their abundances in each pixel of the image. The usual SU chain does not take spectral variability (SV) into account, and relies on the estimation of the Intrinsic Dimensionality (ID) of the data, related to the number of endmembers to use. However, the ID can be significantly overestimated in difficult scenarios, and sometimes does not correspond to the desired scale and application dependent number of endmembers. Spurious endmembers are then frequently included in the model. We propose an algorithm for SU incorporating SV, using collaborative sparsity to discard the least explicative endmembers in the whole image. We compute an algorithmic regularization path for this problem to select the optimal set of endmembers using a statistical criterion. Results on simulated and real data show the interest of the approach.

[1]  Genevera I. Allen,et al.  ADMM Algorithmic Regularization Paths for Sparse Statistical Machine Learning , 2015, 1504.06637.

[2]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  A Review of Nonlinear Hyperspectral Unmixing Methods , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  A new extended linear mixing model to address spectral variability , 2014, 2014 6th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[4]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Hyperspectral Subspace Identification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Blind hyperspectral unmixing using an extended linear mixing model to address spectral variability , 2015, WHISPERS.

[7]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Hyperspectral Local Intrinsic Dimensionality , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Collaborative Sparse Regression for Hyperspectral Unmixing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[11]  D. B. Preston Spectral Analysis and Time Series , 1983 .

[12]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Variability of the endmembers in spectral unmixing: Recent advances , 2016, 2016 8th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[13]  Amandine Robin,et al.  Determining the Intrinsic Dimension of a Hyperspectral Image Using Random Matrix Theory , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[15]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Vertex component analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.

[17]  David Mary,et al.  Blind and Fully Constrained Unmixing of Hyperspectral Images , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.