Detecting regions of interest in fMRI: an application on exploratory-based data analysis

Cluster validity has been mainly used to evaluate the quality of individual clusters, and compare the whole partitions resulting from different or same (using different parameters) clustering algorithms. However, depending on the application, the demands for a validity measure may differ, resulting the necessity of introducing new measures which will suit to the problem under investigation. We introduce a new statistical concept for quantitative validation of fMRI analysis methods based on the exploratory data analysis algorithms. A "greedy" algorithm which combines partitions on a sequential basis is applied on 100 runs of a clustering algorithm with randomized cluster initialization. As a result, a fuzzy partition is derived where every data point is assigned to a cluster with a certain degree of "support". The purpose of this measure is to check the stability of the resulting clustering structures and improve the diagnostic reliability of fMRI post-processing strategies.

[1]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[3]  R Baumgartner,et al.  Quantification of intensity variations in functional MR images using rotated principal components. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  CLUSTERING VALIDATION: RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR APPLIED ANALYSES , 1996 .

[5]  Michael P. Windham,et al.  Cluster Validity for the Fuzzy c-Means Clustering Algorithrm , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  S. Dolnicar,et al.  An examination of indexes for determining the number of clusters in binary data sets , 2002, Psychometrika.

[7]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  A Combination Scheme for Fuzzy Clustering , 2002, AFSS.

[8]  Claus Lamm,et al.  Fuzzy cluster analysis of high-field functional MRI data , 2003, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[9]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set , 1985 .

[10]  E Moser,et al.  Characterization of BOLD activation in multi‐echo fMRI data using fuzzy cluster analysis and a comparison with quantitative modeling , 2001, NMR in biomedicine.

[11]  G. De Soete,et al.  Clustering and Classification , 2019, Data-Driven Science and Engineering.

[12]  J. Bezdek Numerical taxonomy with fuzzy sets , 1974 .

[13]  André Hardy,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set , 1994 .

[14]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Validity-guided (re)clustering with applications to image segmentation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[15]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[16]  J. Dunn Well-Separated Clusters and Optimal Fuzzy Partitions , 1974 .

[17]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Sequential Competitive Learning and the Fuzzy c-Means Clustering Algorithms , 1996, Neural Networks.

[18]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  A monte carlo study of thirty internal criterion measures for cluster analysis , 1981 .

[19]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Validity studies in clustering methodologies , 1979, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  R Baumgartner,et al.  Resampling as a cluster validation technique in fMRI , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Isak Gath,et al.  Unsupervised Optimal Fuzzy Clustering , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..