Evolving and Comparing Greenhouse Control Strategies using Model-Based Multi-Objective Optimization

Optimal control of greenhouse environments is a difficult problem to solve, mainly due to the presence of many user-adjustable control settings and complex microclimate-crop interactions. Although maximizing profit is a typical primary objective, narrowing down a grower’s needs into a single objective may not always be realistic, depending on other secondary objectives such as minimizing energy costs or maximizing yield. These challenges make obtaining suitable solutions elusive because growers cannot rely solely on experience to determine the exact effects on the crop of changing any of the controller’s settings. We use NSGA-II, a popular multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, along with a combined microclimate-crop-yield model, to evolve microclimate control setpoints based on a classical control strategy, using the value of the crop yield and the variable costs as objectives. The results show that the evolved environmental setpoints can provide the grower a variety of better solutions, providing greater profitability compared to not using evolved setpoints. In addition, the evolved classical control strategy is compared with an enhanced version that has different setpoints based on the time of day. When the hypervolumes of their Paretooptimal fronts are used as a performance metric, the results show that the enhanced controller has superior performance.

[1]  de H.F. Zwart,et al.  Analyzing energy-saving options in greenhouse cultivation using a simulation model , 1996 .

[2]  Gerrit van Straten,et al.  Optimal Control of Greenhouse Cultivation , 2010 .

[3]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[4]  Cecilia Stanghellini,et al.  Simulation of Greenhouse Management in the Subtropics, Part I: Model Validation and Scenario Study for the Winter Season , 2005 .

[5]  H. Challa,et al.  Development, calibration and validation of a greenhouse tomato growth model: I. Description of the model☆ , 1993 .

[6]  Marc Tchamitchian,et al.  Optimal temperature regimes for a greenhouse crop with a carbohydrate pool: A modelling study , 1994 .

[7]  B.H.E. Vanthoor,et al.  A model-based greenhouse design method , 2011 .

[8]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[9]  Lihong Xu,et al.  Energy-saving control of greenhouse climate based on MOCC strategy , 2009, GEC '09.

[10]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Tomato growth and yield : quantitative analysis and synthesis , 1996 .

[11]  Tetsuo Morimoto,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF PLANT GROWTH IN HYDROPONICS USING NEURAL NETWORKS AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS , 1996 .

[12]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  The Hypervolume Indicator Revisited: On the Design of Pareto-compliant Indicators Via Weighted Integration , 2007, EMO.

[13]  G. Bot Greenhouse climate: from physical processes to a dynamic model , 1983 .

[14]  Mehdi Mahdavian,et al.  Multi-objective optimization and decision making for greenhouse climate control system considering user preference and data clustering , 2017, Cluster Computing.

[15]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Innovization: innovating design principles through optimization , 2006, GECCO.

[16]  Belkacem Draoui,et al.  Optimization of Greenhouse Climate Model Parameters Using Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithms , 2011 .

[17]  Marc Parizeau,et al.  Open BEAGLE: A New C++ Evolutionary Computation Framework , 2002, GECCO.

[18]  Silke Hemming,et al.  Simple greenhouse climate model as a design tool for greenhouses in tropical lowland , 2007 .

[19]  L. Dagum,et al.  OpenMP: an industry standard API for shared-memory programming , 1998 .

[20]  Zhuhong Zhang,et al.  Multiobjective optimization immune algorithm in dynamic environments and its application to greenhouse control , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[21]  D. de Halleux,et al.  Adjustment and validation of a greenhouse climate dynamic model [Gembloux Greenhouse Dynamic Model (GGDM)] , 1991 .

[22]  David B. Knoester,et al.  ROBUST MULTI-OBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY OPTIMIZATION TO ALLOW GREENHOUSE PRODUCTION/ENERGY USE TRADEOFFS , 2014 .

[23]  James W. Jones,et al.  The DSSAT cropping system model , 2003 .

[24]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Modelling biomass production and yield of horticultural crops: a review , 1998 .

[25]  李 鎔範,et al.  数値計算のためのGNU Scientific Libraryの紹介(教育講座) , 2012 .