Evaluation of ground water monitoring network by principal component analysis.

Principal component analysis is a data reduction technique used to identify the important components or factors that explain most of the variance of a system. This technique was extended to evaluating a ground water monitoring network where the variables are monitoring wells. The objective was to identify monitoring wells that are important in predicting the dynamic variation in potentiometric head at a location. The technique is demonstrated through an application to the monitoring network of the Bangkok area. Principal component analysis was carried out for all the monitoring wells of the aquifer, and a ranking scheme based on the frequency of occurrence of a particular well as principal well was developed. The decision maker with budget constraints can now opt to monitor principal wells which can adequately capture the potentiometric head variation in the aquifer. This was evaluated by comparing the observed potentiometric head distribution using data from all available wells and wells selected using the ranking scheme as a guideline.

[1]  Joel Massmann,et al.  Groundwater contamination from waste management sites: The interaction between risk‐based engineering design and regulatory policy: 1. Methodology , 1987 .

[2]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty , 1987 .

[3]  Simulation of a complex groundwater system and an application , 1981 .

[4]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Sampling Design Methods For Groundwater Modeling Under Uncertainty , 1995 .

[5]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Review of Ground‐Water Quality Monitoring Network Design , 1993 .

[6]  H. Loáiciga An optimization approach for groundwater quality monitoring network design , 1989 .

[7]  Miguel A. Mariño,et al.  Regional-scale ground water quality monitoring via integer programming , 1995 .

[8]  Ricardo A. Olea,et al.  Sampling design optimization for spatial functions , 1984 .

[9]  F. Szidarovszky,et al.  A method for optimal observation network design for groundwater management , 1984 .

[10]  Tissa H. Illangasekare,et al.  A technique of reinitialization for efficient simulation of large aquifers using the Discrete Kernel Approach , 1984 .

[11]  P. Robert,et al.  A Unifying Tool for Linear Multivariate Statistical Methods: The RV‐Coefficient , 1976 .

[12]  D. McKinney,et al.  Genetic algorithm solution of groundwater management models , 1994 .

[13]  T. Hall,et al.  Geostatistical schemes for groundwater sampling , 1988 .

[14]  L. L. Rogers,et al.  Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling , 1994 .

[15]  S. Rouhani Variance Reduction Analysis , 1985 .

[16]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Reliable aquifer remediation in the presence of spatially variable hydraulic conductivity: From data to design , 1989 .

[17]  Sadik B. Jawad,et al.  Groundwater monitoring network rationalization using statistical analyses of piezometric fluctuation , 1988 .