Automatic Arc Distortion Correction of Seismograms Using the Low-Rank Matrix Recovery Method

This letter presents a method of correcting the arc distortion of historical seismogram waveforms recorded by pen and paper drum-type seismographs. The proposed method employs the low-rank matrix recovery method to estimate deformation parameters and to correct geometrically distorted seismic waveforms. A seismogram is inherently regular and symmetrical, which motivates us to explore its textural properties. Given that rank is a natural measure of the regularity of textures and images, an undistorted seismogram texture is assumed to have a lower rank than its distorted versions. Thus, the proposed algorithm aims to find parameters that make the rank of the seismogram texture to the minimum. Compared with traditional methods, the proposed method can automatically estimate the parameters of recording devices and works efficiently and robustly.

[1]  Nathan S. Netanyahu,et al.  An Efficient SIFT-Based Mode-Seeking Algorithm for Sub-Pixel Registration of Remotely Sensed Images , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[2]  Maoguo Gong,et al.  A Novel Coarse-to-Fine Scheme for Automatic Image Registration Based on SIFT and Mutual Information , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Tao Xu,et al.  An interactive program on digitizing historical seismograms , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[4]  N. Pino,et al.  On the recovery and analysis of historical seismograms , 2013 .

[5]  E. Church,et al.  Raster‐to‐Vector Image Analysis for Fast Digitization of Historic Seismograms , 2013 .

[6]  王立夫,et al.  Automatic Misalignment Correction of Seismograms Using Low-Rank Matrix Recovery , 2013 .

[7]  Yi Ma,et al.  TILT: Transform Invariant Low-Rank Textures , 2010, ACCV 2010.

[8]  Yi Ma,et al.  Unwrapping low-rank textures on generalized cylindrical surfaces , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[9]  N. Pino,et al.  The analysis of historical seismograms: an important tool for seismic hazard assessment. Case histories from French and Italian earthquakes , 2011 .

[10]  Yi Ma,et al.  Robust principal component analysis? , 2009, JACM.

[11]  N. Pino,et al.  Waveform modeling of historical seismograms of the 1930 Irpinia earthquake provides insight on ‘‘blind’’ faulting in Southern Apennines (Italy) , 2008 .

[12]  Stefano Pintore,et al.  Teseo: A vectoriser of historical seismograms , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[13]  Anthony Lomax,et al.  A Reanalysis of the Hypocentral Location and Related Observations for the Great 1906 California Earthquake , 2005 .

[14]  Peter D. Bromirski,et al.  SeisDig: Software to Digitize Scanned Analog Seismogram Images, User’s Manual , 2003 .

[15]  M. Kikuchi,et al.  Source rupture processes of the 1944 Tonankai earthquake and the 1945 Mikawa earthquake derived from low-gain seismograms , 2003 .

[16]  D. Giardini,et al.  The December 28, 1908, Messina Straits, southern Italy, earthquake: Waveform modeling of regional seismograms , 2000 .

[17]  John K. Pollard,et al.  Accurate geometric correction of ATSR images , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  A. Ardeshir Goshtasby,et al.  Registration of images with geometric distortions , 1988 .

[19]  Markus Båth,et al.  Earthquake magnitude — recent research and current trends , 1981 .