An approximate MIP-DoM calculation for multi-objective optimization using affinity propagation clustering algorithm

Dominance move (DoM) is a quality indicator that compares two solution sets in a Pareto-optimal sense. The main issue related to DoM is its computational expense. A recent paper proposed a mixed-integer programming (MIP) approach for computing DoM that exhibited a computational complexity that is linear to the number of objectives and polynomial to the number of solutions. Even with this property, considering practical situations, the MIP-DoM calculation on some problems may take many hours. This paper presents an approximation method to deal with the problem using a cluster-based and divide-and-conquer strategy. Some experiments are tested, showing that the cluster based-algorithm is computationally much faster and makes a small percentage error from the original DoM value.

[1]  K. Deb,et al.  Analyzing Dominance Move (MIP-DoM) Indicator for Multiobjective and Many-Objective Optimization , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  E. Wanner,et al.  An Assignment Problem Formulation for Dominance Move Indicator , 2020, 2020 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[3]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Efficient computation of expected hypervolume improvement using box decomposition algorithms , 2019, Journal of Global Optimization.

[4]  Xin Yao,et al.  of Birmingham Quality evaluation of solution sets in multiobjective optimisation , 2019 .

[5]  Jingda Deng,et al.  Approximating Hypervolume and Hypervolume Contributions Using Polar Coordinate , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  Wenjing Sun,et al.  A Novel Self-Adaptive Affinity Propagation Clustering Algorithm Based on Density Peak Theory and Weighted Similarity , 2019, IEEE Access.

[7]  Xin Yao,et al.  Dominance Move: A Measure of Comparing Solution Sets in Multiobjective Optimization , 2017, ArXiv.

[8]  Leslie Pérez Cáceres,et al.  The irace package: Iterated racing for automatic algorithm configuration , 2016 .

[9]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Modified Distance Calculation in Generational Distance and Inverted Generational Distance , 2015, EMO.

[10]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  On Minimum-Cost Assignments in Unbalanced Bipartite Graphs , 2012 .

[11]  D. Pham,et al.  Selection of K in K-means clustering , 2005 .

[12]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[13]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Mean Shift: A Robust Approach Toward Feature Space Analysis , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Yizong Cheng,et al.  Mean Shift, Mode Seeking, and Clustering , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..