Change in Engineering Education: One Myth, Two Scenarios, and Three Foci

Change is coming to engineering education, but many reform efforts have proceeded without explicitly examining the prime movers of change, the forces that resist change, or the facets or foci of the system that are most in need of change. This essay frames the current debate by seeing change as motivated by external competitive and technological forces. Resistance to change is viewed as being reinforced by the fundamental myth of engineering education that asserts the supremacy of basic research over all other engineering academic activities. After providing evidence that the myth resulted largely from an overestimation of the role of science and an underestimation of the role of engineering in World War II, the essay considers needed organizational, integrative, and programmatic changes. Among these are the creation of student-faculty teams responsible for delivering a quality education, bottom-up alliances with industrial clients, and a number of proposals aimed at helping the profession explore its human, philosophical, and historical underpinnings. The essay concludes by warning that times of great change risk making matters worse through the unintended consequences of reform. A principled methodology of reform is suggested that advocates distributed and competitive implementation together with a special appreciation for knowledge that is difficult to articulate.

[1]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Experiences with an Industrially Sponsored Project Course , 1992, Proceedings. Twenty-Second Annual conference Frontiers in Education.

[2]  Bill Creech,et al.  The Five Pillars of TQM: How to Make Total Quality Management Work for You , 1994 .

[3]  Ronald H. Coase,et al.  The Firm, the Market, and the Law , 1990 .

[4]  T. Sowell Inside American Education: The Decline, The Deception, The Dogmas , 1993 .

[5]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[6]  T. Sowell Knowledge and Decisions , 1980 .

[7]  Walter Guido Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History by Walter G. Vincenti , 1992, Technology and Culture.

[8]  Gary Burns Impostors in the Temple , 1996 .

[9]  Barbara C. Jordan Shaping America's Future , 1976 .

[10]  Eugene S. Ferguson,et al.  Engineering and the Mind's Eye , 1994 .

[11]  David E. Goldberg Life Skills and Leadership for Engineers , 1994 .

[12]  Edwin T. Layton,et al.  The Revolt of the Engineers: Social Responsibility and the American Engineering Profession by Edwin T. Layton, Jr (review) , 2023 .

[13]  Gustavo Stubrich The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[14]  Monte A. Calvert,et al.  Men and ideas in engineering : twelve histories from Illinois , 1968 .

[15]  James L. Adams,et al.  Flying Buttresses, Entropy, and O-Rings: The World of an Engineer , 1991 .

[16]  Charles J. Sykes,et al.  Professors as the New Deviants: "Profscam" and American Higher Education@@@Profscam: Professors and the Demise of Higher Education , 1988 .

[17]  H. Hazlitt Economics in One Lesson , 1946 .

[18]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. , 1992 .

[19]  H. Rosovsky,et al.  The University: An Owner's Manual , 1990 .

[20]  C. D. Coryell Manhattan Project: The Untold story of the Making of the Atomic Bomb , 1968 .

[21]  J. Bordogna,et al.  Engineering Education: Innovation Through Integration , 1993 .

[22]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Myth of the Superhuman Professor , 1994 .

[23]  A. Thomson Closing of the American Mind , 1990 .

[24]  P. Hersey,et al.  Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources , 1971 .

[25]  M. Harrison [Endless horizons]. , 1969, L' Infirmiere canadienne.