Small vessel enhancement in MRA images using local maximum mean processing

The enhancement of small vessels in MRA imaging is an important problem. In this paper, we propose using local maximum mean (LMM) processing to enhance the detectability of small vessels. At each voxel in the original three-dimensional (3-D) data set, the LMM over the line segments in the cube centered at the voxel is taken and used to form the 3-D LMM data set. The maximum intensity projection (MIP) is then applied to the LMM data to produce the two-dimensional (2-D) LMM-MIP image. Through LMM processing, the variance of background tissue is reduced, thus increasing the detectability of small vessels. Moreover, the single bright voxels are suppressed and the disconnected small vessels can be connected. However, the LMM processing widens the larger, brighter vessels. To keep the advantages provided by both the LMM-MIP and MIP images, it is proposed that weight functions be used to combine them. The performance of the LMM-MIP algorithm is analyzed and compared with the performance of the MIP algorithm under three measures: The vessel voxel projection probability, the vessel receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the vessel-tissue contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Closed forms of the three measures are obtained. It is shown that the LMM-MIP algorithm improves the detectability of small vessels under all three measures. The longer the projection path and the larger the CNR of the original data, then the greater the improvement. Confirming the theoretical analysis, results of an experiment utilizing practical MRA data demonstrate the improved visual quality of small vessels.

[1]  G Laub,et al.  Displays for MR angiography , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  F. R. Korosec,et al.  A data adaptive reprojection technique for MR angiography , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  L B Lusted,et al.  Radiographic applications of signal detection theory. , 1972, Radiology.

[4]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part II: Noisy images , 1974 .

[6]  H. Barlow.  The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[7]  A. Burgess.  Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  P. Guignard,et al.  A comparative method based on ROC analysis for the quantitation of observer performance in scintigraphy. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  E M Haacke,et al.  Gadolinium‐enhanced high‐resolution MR angiography with adaptive vessel tracking: Preliminary results in the intracranial circulation , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  H H Barrett,et al.  Null functions and eigenfunctions: tools for the analysis of imaging systems. , 1991, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[13]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[14]  A. Burgess.  Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[15]  A. Holden.  Graded potentials accompanying antidromic invasion of the pigeon retina , 1978, Vision Research.

[16]  K Doi,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images. , 1986, Medical physics.

[17]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[18]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part I: Noiseless images. , 1974, Medical physics.

[19]  K Doi,et al.  A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  P. J. Keller,et al.  MR angiography with two-dimensional acquisition and three-dimensional display. Work in progress. , 1989, Radiology.

[21]  J Hale,et al.  An Algorithm for MR Angiography Image Enhancement , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  D L Parker,et al.  Vessel enhancement filtering in three‐dimensional MR angiography , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Lesion detection and signal–to–noise ratio in CT images , 1981 .

[25]  Yi Sun,et al.  Performance analysis of maximum intensity projection algorithm for display of MRA images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  H H Barrett,et al.  Ideal versus human observer for long-tailed point spread functions: does deconvolution help? , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  H H Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[30]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  Statistical Efficiency Of Perceptual Decisions , 1984, Other Conferences.

[31]  Donna G. Brown,et al.  Contrast‐to‐noise ratios in maximum intensity projection images , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[33]  Yiping Peter Du.  Improvement of Small Vessel Visibility in Three - Time-Of Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 1995 .

[34]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[35]  G T Gullberg,et al.  MR vascular imaging with a fast gradient refocusing pulse sequence and reformatted images from transaxial sections. , 1987, Radiology.

[36]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part II: Noisy images. , 1977, Medical physics.