Socially contingent humanoid robot head behaviour results in increased charity donations
暂无分享,去创建一个
Tony Belpaeme | Paul Baxter | Emmanuel Senft | James Kennedy | Paul Wills | Tony Belpaeme | James Kennedy | Paul E. Baxter | Emmanuel Senft | P. Wills
[1] R. Bull,et al. The Influences of Eye-Gaze, Style of Dress, and Locality on the Amounts of Money Donated to a Charity , 1981 .
[2] N. Emery,et al. The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[3] Takayuki Kanda,et al. How contingent should a lifelike robot be? The relationship between contingency and complexity , 2007, Connect. Sci..
[4] Tony Belpaeme,et al. A study of a retro-projected robotic face and its effectiveness for gaze reading by humans , 2010, HRI 2010.
[5] Mathias Ekström. Do watching eyes affect charitable giving? Evidence from a field experiment , 2012 .
[6] Bilge Mutlu,et al. Designing persuasive robots: How robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
[7] D. Nettle,et al. Eye Images Increase Charitable Donations: Evidence From an Opportunistic Field Experiment in a Supermarket , 2012 .
[8] Yiannis Demiris,et al. iCharibot: Design and Field Trials of a Fundraising Robot , 2013, ICSR.
[9] Tony Belpaeme,et al. The Robot Who Tried Too Hard: Social Behaviour of a Robot Tutor Can Negatively Affect Child Learning , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).