Doubly Distributional Population Codes: Simultaneous Representation of Uncertainty and Multiplicity

Perceptual inference fundamentally involves uncertainty, arising from noise in sensation and the ill-posed nature of many perceptual problems. Accurate perception requires that this uncertainty be correctly represented, manipulated, and learned about. The choicessubjects makein various psychophysical experiments suggest that they do indeed take such uncertainty into account when making perceptual inferences, posing the question as to how uncertainty is represented in the activities of neuronal populations. Most theoretical investigations of population coding have ignored this issue altogether; the few existing proposals that address it do so in such a way that it is fatally conflated with another facet of perceptual problems that also needs correct handling: multiplicity (that is, the simultaneous presence of multiple distinct stimuli). We present and validate a more powerful proposal for the way that population activity may encode uncertainty, both distinctly from and simultaneously with multiplicity.

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[3]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Perceptual Organization in Multistable Apparent Motion , 1985, Perception.

[4]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[5]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[6]  E I Knudsen,et al.  Visual instruction of the neural map of auditory space in the developing optic tectum. , 1991, Science.

[7]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Experience-dependent plasticity in the inferior colliculus: a site for visual calibration of the neural representation of auditory space in the barn owl , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Charles H. Anderson,et al.  BASIC ELEMENTS OF BIOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[10]  C H Keller,et al.  Representation of multiple sound sources in the owl's auditory space map , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  R Ivry,et al.  A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. , 1996, Psychological review.

[12]  E. Adelson,et al.  Slow and Smooth: A Bayesian theory for the combination of local motion signals in human vision , 1998 .

[13]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[14]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Distributional Population Codes and Multiple Motion Models , 1998, NIPS.

[15]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Probabilistic Interpretation of Population Codes , 1996, Neural Computation.

[16]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[17]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Narrow Versus Wide Tuning Curves: What's Best for a Population Code? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[18]  K. Saberi,et al.  Neural bases of an auditory illusion and its elimination in owls , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Zemel,et al.  Information processing with population codes , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[21]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Seeing multiple directions of motion—physiology and psychophysics , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Christian W. Eurich,et al.  Multidimensional Encoding Strategy of Spiking Neurons , 2000, Neural Computation.

[23]  A. Feng,et al.  Neural basis of hearing in real-world situations. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  J. Saunders,et al.  Perception of 3D surface orientation from skew symmetry , 2001, Vision Research.

[25]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[26]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and haptic percepts , 2001, Vision Research.

[27]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain , 2001, Nature.

[28]  A. Pouget,et al.  Efficient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[30]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  The optic tectum controls visually guided adaptive plasticity in the owl's auditory space map , 2002, Nature.

[31]  Christian W. Eurich,et al.  Representational Accuracy of Stochastic Neural Populations , 2002, Neural Computation.

[32]  M. Paradiso,et al.  A theory for the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Information in channel-coded systems: correlated receivers , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  W. Heiligenberg,et al.  How sensory maps could enhance resolution through ordered arrangements of broadly tuned receivers , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[35]  G. Recanzone Experience-dependent plasticity , 2022 .