Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal?

We develop a general population genetic framework for analyzing selection on many loci, and apply it to strong truncation and disruptive selection on an additive polygenic trait. We first present statistical methods for analyzing the infinitesimal model, in which offspring breeding values are normally distributed around the mean of the parents, with fixed variance. These show that the usual assumption of a Gaussian distribution of breeding values in the population gives remarkably accurate predictions for the mean and the variance, even when disruptive selection generates substantial deviations from normality. We then set out a general genetic analysis of selection and recombination. The population is represented by multilocus cumulants describing the distribution of haploid genotypes, and selection is described by the relation between mean fitness and these cumulants. We provide exact recursions in terms of generating functions for the effects of selection on non-central moments. The effects of recombination are simply calculated as a weighted sum over all the permutations produced by meiosis. Finally, the new cumulants that describe the next generation are computed from the non-central moments. Although this scheme is applied here in detail only to selection on an additive trait, it is quite general. For arbitrary epistasis and linkage, we describe a consistent infinitesimal limit in which the short-term selection response is dominated by infinitesimal allele frequency changes and linkage disequilibria. Numerical multilocus results show that the standard Gaussian approximation gives accurate predictions for the dynamics of the mean and genetic variance in this limit. Even with intense truncation selection, linkage disequilibria of order three and higher never cause much deviation from normality. Thus, the empirical deviations frequently found between predicted and observed responses to artificial selection are not caused by linkage-disequilibrium-induced departures from normality. Disruptive selection can generate substantial four-way disequilibria, and hence kurtosis; but even then, the Gaussian assumption predicts the variance accurately. In contrast to the apparent simplicity of the infinitesimal limit, data suggest that changes in genetic variance after 10 or more generations of selection are likely to be dominated by allele frequency dynamics that depend on genetic details.

[1]  R. Fisher,et al.  148: Moments and Cumulants in the Specification of Distributions. , 1938 .

[2]  J. Bennett On the theory of random mating. , 1954, Annals of eugenics.

[3]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[4]  K KOJIMA,et al.  Changes of mean fitness in random mating populations when epistasis and linkage are present. , 1961, Genetics.

[5]  M. Slatkin Selection and polygenic characters. , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Bulmer,et al.  The Effect of Selection on Genetic Variability , 1971, The American Naturalist.

[7]  M. Slatkin,et al.  On treating the chromosome as the unit of selection. , 1972, Genetics.

[8]  J. Thoday,et al.  Evolution of Niche Width , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[9]  R. Lande NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  S Karlin,et al.  Models of multifactorial inheritance: I. Multivariate formulations and basic convergence results. , 1979, Theoretical population biology.

[11]  J. Felsenstein,et al.  Excursions along the Interface between Disruptive and Stabilizing Selection. , 1979, Genetics.

[12]  Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster : II. Lethals and visible mutants with large effects , 1980 .

[13]  M. Bulmer The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics , 1981 .

[14]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  M. Turelli Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. , 1984, Theoretical population biology.

[16]  W. G. Hill,et al.  The selection limit due to the conflict between truncation and stabilizing selection with mutation. , 1986, Genetics.

[17]  N. Barton The effects of linkage and density-dependent regulation on gene flow , 1986, Heredity.

[18]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION: STATISTICAL INFERENCE AND BIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  M. Kendall,et al.  Kendall's advanced theory of statistics , 1995 .

[21]  Z. Zeng Genotypic distribution at the limits to natural and artificial selection with mutation. , 1987, Theoretical population biology.

[22]  N. Barton,et al.  Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. , 1987, Genetical research.

[23]  A. Robertson,et al.  The Isolation of Polygenic Factors Controlling Bristle Score in Drosophila Melanogaster. II. Distribution of Third Chromosome Bristle Effects within Chromosome Sections. , 1988, Genetics.

[24]  P. Keightley Models of quantitative variation of flux in metabolic pathways. , 1989, Genetics.

[25]  N. Barton,et al.  Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? , 1989, Annual review of genetics.

[26]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Unravelling the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex : a Commentary on ' Mutation–selection Balance and the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex and Recombination ' , 2022 .

[27]  T. Mackay,et al.  Molecular and phenotypic variation in the achaete-scute region of Drosophila melanogaster , 1990, Nature.

[28]  N. Barton,et al.  Dynamics of polygenic characters under selection. , 1990 .

[29]  N. Barton,et al.  Natural and sexual selection on many loci. , 1991, Genetics.

[30]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Mixed model analysis of a selection experiment for food intake in mice. , 1991, Genetical research.

[31]  R. Bürger Moments, cumulants, and polygenic dynamics. , 1991, Journal of mathematical biology.

[32]  N. Barton ON THE SPREAD OF NEW GENE COMBINATIONS IN THE THIRD PHASE OF WRIGHT'S SHIFTING‐BALANCE , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  L. Zhivotovsky,et al.  Quantitative variability and multilocus polymorphism under epistatic selection. , 1992, Theoretical population biology.

[34]  W. Bradshaw,et al.  Epistasis and the genetic divergence of photoperiodism between populations of the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. , 1992, Genetics.

[35]  M. A. López,et al.  Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of mutant effects on the trait and fitness. , 1993, Genetical research.

[36]  A. Hastings,et al.  Maintenance of genetic variability under strong stabilizing selection: a two-locus model. , 1993, Genetics.

[37]  T. Smith,et al.  Disruptive selection and the genetic basis of bill size polymorphism in the African finch Pyrenestes , 1993, Nature.

[38]  T. Nagylaki The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection. , 1993, Genetics.

[39]  R. Bürger Predictions of the dynamics of a polygenic character under directional selection. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  L. Penrose,et al.  THE CORRELATION BETWEEN RELATIVES ON THE SUPPOSITION OF MENDELIAN INHERITANCE , 2022 .