Learning a gradient grammar of French liaison

In certain French words, an orthgraphically-final consonant is unpronounced except, in certain environments, when it precedes a vowel. This phenomenon, liaison, shows significant interactions with several other patterns in French (including h-aspire, schwa deletion, and the presence of other morphemes in the liaison context). We present a learning algorithm that acquires a grammar that accounts for these patterns and their interactions. The learned grammar employs Gradient Symbolic Computation (GSC), incorporating weighted constraints and partially-activated symbolic representations. Grammatical analysis in the GSC framework includes the challenging determination of the numerical strength of symbolic constituent activations (as well as constraints). Here we present the first general algorithm for learning these quantities from empirical examples: the Error-Driven Gradient Activation Readjustment (EDGAR). Smolensky and Goldrick (2016) proposed a GSC analysis, with hand-determined numerical strengths, in which liaison derives from the coalescence of partially-activated input consonants. EDGAR allows us to extend this work to a wider range of liaison phenomena by automatically determining the more comprehensive set of numerical strengths required to generate the complex pattern of overall liaison behaviour.

[1]  Michael T. Putnam,et al.  Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing , 2016 .

[2]  Pyeong Whan Cho,et al.  Incremental parsing in a continuous dynamical system: sentence processing in Gradient Symbolic Computation , 2017 .

[3]  P. Boersma,et al.  Convergence Properties of a Gradual Learning Algorithm for Harmonic Grammar , 2013 .

[4]  Marie-Hélène Côté,et al.  Consonant cluster phonotactics : a perceptual approach , 2000 .

[5]  Y. Morin La liaison relève-t-elle d'une tendance à éviter les hiatus ? Réflexions sur son évolution historique , 2005 .

[6]  Eric Rosen Predicting semi-regular patterns in morphologically complex words , 2018 .

[7]  Bernard Tranel,et al.  French liaison and elision revisited: A unified account within Optimality Theory , 1994 .

[8]  Eric R Rosen Learning complex inflectional paradigms through blended gradient inputs , 2019 .

[9]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Mechanisms of syntactic change , 1979 .

[10]  R. Baayen,et al.  Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Keren Rice,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Phonology , 2011 .

[12]  Oriana Kilbourn-Ceron Speech production planning affects phonological variability: a case study in French liaison , 2017 .

[13]  B. Hayes,et al.  Intersecting constraint families: An argument for harmonic grammar , 2017 .

[14]  Eric Robert Rosen Evidence for Gradient Input Features from Sino-Japanese Compound Accent , 2019 .

[15]  Matthew Goldrick,et al.  Optimization and Quantization in Gradient Symbol Systems: A Framework for Integrating the Continuous and the Discrete in Cognition , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Gradient Symbolic Representations in Grammar: The case of French Liaison , 2016 .