Cartesian impedance control techniques for torque controlled light-weight robots

The paper compares various approaches to implementing a compliant Cartesian behavior for robotic manipulators: impedance, admittance and stiffness control. A new controller structure is proposed, which consists of an impedance controller enhanced by local stiffness control. This structure consistently takes into account the two time scale property of the joint and Cartesian control loops. The DLR light-weight robot, with its position, torque and impedance interfaces on joint level, is an adequate platform for the implementation of the presented methods. The experimental results are discussed and a critical comparison of the performance with different controllers is made. As an application for the new control structure the fast and intuitive teaching of an insertion task (piston into a motor block) is described.

[1]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Parameter identification and passivity based joint control for a 7 DOF torque controlled light weight robot , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[2]  J. Salisbury,et al.  Active stiffness control of a manipulator in cartesian coordinates , 1980, 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[3]  D. Abadia,et al.  Comparative Analysis and Development of Control Systems for the DLR Light Weight Robot , 2000 .

[4]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  From Humans to a New Generation of Manipulators: Control and Design Principles , 2001 .

[5]  Imin Kao,et al.  Theory of Stiffness Control in Robotics Using the Conservative Congruence Transformation , 2000 .

[6]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  Six-DOF impedance control based on angle/axis representations , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Imin Kao,et al.  Simulation of conservative congruence transformation. Conservative properties in the joint and Cartesian spaces , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[8]  N. Hogan Mechanical Impedance of Single- and Multi-Articular Systems , 1990 .

[9]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  State feedback controller for flexible joint robots: a globally stable approach implemented on DLR's light-weight robots , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[10]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  On a new generation of torque controlled light-weight robots , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[11]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Flexible robot-assembly using a multi-sensory approach , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[12]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[13]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Günter Schreiber,et al.  Interactive redundant robotics: control of the inverted pendulum with nullspace motion , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[15]  Alin Albu-Schaffer,et al.  Design and Haptic Control of a 6 DoF Force-Feedback Device , 2001 .