Mating Strategies in a Darwinian Microworld: Simulating the Consequences of Female Reproductive Refractoriness

Characteristic sex differences in mating strategies (e.g., choosy females, unselective males) have been claimed by Trivers and other theorists to evolve as an automatic consequence of sex differences in minimum parental investment, arising chiefly from greater female reproductive refractoriness. The theory has been supported by correlational evidence and conceptual analogies to economics. A simulated evolution experiment was performed to provide a clearer test of whether female reproductive refractoriness alone can drive the emergence of differences in mating selectivity. A population of male and female replicators initially differed only in that females were unavailable to mate for a fixed period prior to the appearance of offspring. Over succeeding generations, females evolved far greater selectivity than males with respect to the longevity of potential mates. This greater selectivity was relatively robust with respect to population and genetic parameters, but quantitatively unstable with realistic breeding population sizes.

[1]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[2]  F. Varela,et al.  Toward a Practice of Autonomous Systems: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life , 1992 .

[3]  D. Fogel,et al.  On the instability of evolutionary stable strategies. , 1997, Bio Systems.

[4]  P. Medawar UNSOLVED problem of biology. , 1953, The Medical journal of Australia.

[5]  ダーウィン チャールス,et al.  The descent of man and selection in relation to sex , 1907 .

[6]  R. Sokal Evolutionary Genetics , 1972, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[7]  P. Bennett Sex, Evolution and Behavior; second edition by Martin Daly and Margo Wilson, Willard Grant Press, 1983. (xiv + 402 pages) ISBN 0 87150 767 6 , 1985, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  George C. Williams,et al.  Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .

[9]  B. Bernstein,et al.  Animal Behavior , 1927, Japanese Marine Life.

[10]  Bateman Aj Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. , 1948 .

[11]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Evolutionary wanderlust: sexual selection with directional mate preferences , 1993 .

[12]  P E Kloeden,et al.  Slower aging in women: a proposed evolutionary explanation. , 1995, Bio Systems.

[13]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[14]  Jason Noble Sexual Signalling in an Artificial Population: When Does the Handicap Principle Work? , 1999, ECAL.

[15]  R. Brooks Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival , 2000, Nature.

[16]  B. Campbell Forces and Strategies in Evolution. (Book Reviews: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971) , 1972 .

[17]  Geoffrey P. Miller From animals to animats. 2: Proceedings of the second international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior: Jean-Arcady Meyer, Herbert L. Roitblat, Stewart W. Wilson, (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books, 1993. ISBN 0-262-63149-0. x + 523 pp., US$55.00 paperback , 1994 .

[18]  M R Rose,et al.  Evolutionary theory predicts late-life mortality plateaus. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Daly,et al.  Sex, evolution, and behavior , 1978 .

[20]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  Evolutionary Genetics 2nd ed , 1999 .

[21]  Seth Bullock A continuous evolutionary simulation model of the attainability of honest signalling equilibria , 1998 .