Online Multi-frame Blind Deconvolution with Super-resolution and Saturation Correction

Astronomical images taken by ground-based telescopes suffer degradation due to atmospheric turbulence. This degradation can be tackled by costly hardware-based approaches such as adaptive optics, or by sophisticated software-based methods such as lucky imaging, speckle imaging, or multi-frame deconvolution. Software-based methods process a sequence of images to reconstruct a deblurred high-quality image. However, existing approaches are limited in one or several aspects: (i) they process all images in batch mode, which for thousands of images is prohibitive; (ii) they do not reconstruct a super-resolved image, even though an image sequence often contains enough information; (iii) they are unable to deal with saturated pixels; and (iv) they are usually non-blind, i.e., they assume the blur kernels to be known. In this paper we present a new method for multi-frame deconvolution called online blind deconvolution (OBD) that overcomes all these limitations simultaneously. Encouraging results on simulated and real astronomical images demonstrate that OBD yields deblurred images of comparable and often better quality than existing approaches.

[1]  Stuart Jefferies,et al.  Fast and optimal multiframe blind deconvolution algorithm for high-resolution ground-based imaging of space objects. , 2009, Applied optics.

[2]  C. P. Gupta,et al.  Applications of Mathematics , 2007 .

[3]  Léon Bottou,et al.  On-line learning and stochastic approximations , 1999 .

[4]  Seymour E. Goodman,et al.  Performance Computing in the , 1993 .

[5]  B. Krauskopf,et al.  Proc of SPIE , 2003 .

[6]  A. Lohmann,et al.  Speckle masking in astronomy: triple correlation theory and applications. , 1983, Applied optics.

[7]  Michael Elad,et al.  Advances and challenges in super‐resolution , 2004, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[8]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Topics in Matrix Analysis , 1991 .

[9]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  A. C. Brooms Stochastic Approximation and Recursive Algorithms with Applications, 2nd edn by H. J. Kushner and G. G. Yin , 2006 .

[11]  Cambridge,et al.  Lucky imaging: High angular resolution imaging in the visible from the ground , 2005, astro-ph/0507299.

[12]  Yulia V Zhulina,et al.  Multiframe blind deconvolution of heavily blurred astronomical images. , 2006, Applied optics.

[13]  Jean-Luc Starck,et al.  Deconvolution and Blind Deconvolution in Astronomy , 2007 .

[14]  Qiheng Zhang,et al.  Blind deconvolution of a noisy degraded image. , 2009, Applied optics.

[15]  Mats G. Lofdahl Multi-frame blind deconvolution with linear equality constraints , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[16]  Timothy J. Schulz,et al.  Multiframe blind deconvolution of astronomical images , 1993 .

[17]  PROCEssIng magazInE IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , 2004 .

[18]  J. C. Dainty,et al.  Iterative blind deconvolution method and its applications , 1988 .

[19]  H. Kushner,et al.  Stochastic Approximation and Recursive Algorithms and Applications , 2003 .

[20]  Deepa Kundur,et al.  Blind image deconvolution , 1996, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[21]  R. Lane,et al.  Fast simulation of a kolmogorov phase screen. , 1999, Applied optics.

[22]  Marcel Carbillet,et al.  Reduction of boundary effects in multiple image deconvolution with an application to LBT LINC-NIRVANA , 2006 .

[23]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  An Iterative Image Space Reconstruction Algorthm Suitable for Volume ECT , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Hanns Ruder,et al.  Suppressing anisoplanatism effects in speckle interferometry , 2007 .

[26]  G. Cristóbal,et al.  Simultaneous super-resolution and blind deconvolution , 2008 .

[27]  K. Knox,et al.  Recovery of Images from Atmospherically Degraded Short-Exposure Photographs , 1974 .

[28]  Michael W. Marcellin,et al.  Iterative multiframe superresolution algorithms for atmospheric-turbulence-degraded imagery , 1998 .