Automated monitoring of behavior reveals bursty interaction patterns and rapid spreading dynamics in honeybee social networks

Significance Interaction patterns in human communication networks are characterized by intermittency and unpredictable timing (burstiness). Simulated spreading dynamics through such networks are slower than expected. A technology for automated recording of social interactions of individual honeybees, developed by the authors, enables one to study these two phenomena in a nonhuman society. Specifically, by analyzing more than 1.2 million bee social interactions, we demonstrate that burstiness is not a human-specific interaction pattern. We furthermore show that spreading dynamics on bee social networks are faster than expected, confirming earlier theoretical predictions that burstiness and fast spreading can co-occur. We expect that these findings will inform future models of large-scale social organization, spread of disease, and information transmission. Social networks mediate the spread of information and disease. The dynamics of spreading depends, among other factors, on the distribution of times between successive contacts in the network. Heavy-tailed (bursty) time distributions are characteristic of human communication networks, including face-to-face contacts and electronic communication via mobile phone calls, email, and internet communities. Burstiness has been cited as a possible cause for slow spreading in these networks relative to a randomized reference network. However, it is not known whether burstiness is an epiphenomenon of human-specific patterns of communication. Moreover, theory predicts that fast, bursty communication networks should also exist. Here, we present a high-throughput technology for automated monitoring of social interactions of individual honeybees and the analysis of a rich and detailed dataset consisting of more than 1.2 million interactions in five honeybee colonies. We find that bees, like humans, also interact in bursts but that spreading is significantly faster than in a randomized reference network and remains so even after an experimental demographic perturbation. Thus, while burstiness may be an intrinsic property of social interactions, it does not always inhibit spreading in real-world communication networks. We anticipate that these results will inform future models of large-scale social organization and information and disease transmission, and may impact health management of threatened honeybee populations.

[1]  M. Delia Allen,et al.  The honeybee queen and her attendants , 1960 .

[2]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  From seconds to months: an overview of multi-scale dynamics of mobile telephone calls , 2015, The European Physical Journal B.

[3]  A. S. Edwards,et al.  Ontogeny of orientation flight in the honeybee revealed by harmonic radar , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Petter Holme,et al.  Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium , 2015, ArXiv.

[5]  Kwang-Il Goh,et al.  Burstiness and memory in complex systems , 2006 .

[6]  J. Nieh The honey bee shaking signal: function and design of a modulatory communication signal , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  Keith D. Waddington,et al.  Symposium: Insects in Altered Environments: Body Size and the Functional Length of the Proboscis of Honey Bees , 1987 .

[8]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[9]  R. Menzel,et al.  The spectral input systems of hymenopteran insects and their receptor-based colour vision , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Vincent D. Blondel,et al.  Bursts of Vertex Activation and Epidemics in Evolving Networks , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  J. Free,et al.  A study of the stimuli which release the food begging and offering responses of worker honeybees , 1956 .

[12]  Ofer Feinerman,et al.  Ant trophallactic networks: simultaneous measurement of interaction patterns and food dissemination , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  The interaction of size and density with graph-level indices , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[14]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Oral transfer of chemical cues, growth proteins and hormones in social insects , 2016, eLife.

[15]  C. Butts Social network analysis: A methodological introduction , 2008 .

[16]  Robert E. Page,et al.  Genetic variability for temporal polyethism in colonies consisting of similarly-aged worker honey bees , 1989 .

[17]  Nathalie Stroeymeyt,et al.  Organisational immunity in social insects. , 2014, Current opinion in insect science.

[18]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[19]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[20]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal network sparsity and the slowing down of spreading , 2014, ArXiv.

[21]  Petter Holme,et al.  Birth and death of links control disease spreading in empirical contact networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[22]  F. Moore,et al.  Polynomial Codes Over Certain Finite Fields , 2017 .

[23]  R. May,et al.  Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control , 1991, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Feeding and Stocking Up: Radio-Labelled Food Reveals Exchange Patterns in Ants , 2009, PloS one.

[25]  N. Koeniger The biology of the honey bee , 1988, Insectes Sociaux.

[26]  Richard James,et al.  Emergency networking: famine relief in ant colonies , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Time-Ordered Networks Reveal Limitations to Information Flow in Ant Colonies , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  Z. Y. Huang,et al.  Effects of colony food shortage on social interactions in honey bee colonies , 2002, Insectes Sociaux.

[29]  E. Wilson The Insect Societies , 1974 .

[30]  Robert Heinsohn,et al.  Social networks created with different techniques are not comparable , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[32]  Dietmar Plenz,et al.  powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  C. List,et al.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  János Kertész,et al.  Spreading dynamics on networks: the role of burstiness, topology and non-stationarity , 2014, 1404.2468.

[35]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  Richard L. Hellmich,et al.  Relationship Between Different Amounts of Brood and the Collection and Use of Pollen by the Honey Bee (Apis Mellifera) , 1986 .

[37]  Dhruba Naug,et al.  Experimentally induced change in infectious period affects transmission dynamics in a social group , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  H. L. Nixon,et al.  Food transmission within the honeybee community , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[39]  Christian Rutz,et al.  Reality mining of animal social systems. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[41]  E. Genersch,et al.  Deformed wing virus. , 2010, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[42]  W. Farina,et al.  Thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts , 2001, Insectes Sociaux.

[43]  Leellen F. Solter,et al.  The two etiological agents of nosema disease in honey bees , Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae , 2013 .

[44]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Social Insects: A Model System for Network Dynamics , 2013 .

[45]  Sebastian Bonhoeffer,et al.  Short-term activity cycles impede information transmission in ant colonies , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  Romualdo Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Random walks on temporal networks. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[47]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[48]  M. Winston The Biology of the Honey Bee , 1987 .

[49]  W. Farina,et al.  Trophallaxis: A Mechanism of Information Transfer , 2009 .

[50]  A. Crespi,et al.  Tracking Individuals Shows Spatial Fidelity Is a Key Regulator of Ant Social Organization , 2013, Science.

[51]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Small But Slow World: How Network Topology and Burstiness Slow Down Spreading , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[52]  Kimmo Kaski,et al.  Analytically Solvable Model of Spreading Dynamics with Non-Poissonian Processes , 2013, 1309.0701.

[53]  Andrew M. Mountcastle,et al.  BEEtag: A Low-Cost, Image-Based Tracking System for the Study of Animal Behavior and Locomotion , 2015, bioRxiv.

[54]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Impact of non-Poissonian activity patterns on spreading processes. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[55]  Walter R. Tschinkel,et al.  The effect of colony size and starvation on food flow in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[56]  Colin R. Twomey,et al.  Revealing the hidden networks of interaction in mobile animal groups allows prediction of complex behavioral contagion , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  G. Robinson,et al.  Hormonal and Genetic Control of Behavioral Integration in Honey Bee Colonies , 1989, Science.

[58]  Fernando Wario,et al.  Automatic methods for long-term tracking and the detection and decoding of communication dances in honeybees , 2015, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[59]  Philippe Blanchard,et al.  Chronic bee paralysis: a disease and a virus like no other? , 2010, Journal of invertebrate pathology.