Trajectory Optimization of Energy Consumption and Expected Service Life of a Robotic System

Operating times of several years indicate a high influence of energy consumption on the resource efficiency of a robotic system. Consequently, the energy efficiency is addressed by various methods related to the improvement of hardware or to optimal motion planning. However, the service life and a potential prolongation impact the resource efficiency as well. Correspondingly, a multi-objective trajectory optimization allows to consider energy consumption and expected service life in conjunction. To this end, both criteria are modeled based on the structure and components of an exemplary manipulator. Simplifications of the objective function are proposed for optimization purposes. Corresponding results for an exemplary task are discussed and indicate the feasibility of the simplified objective function. Furthermore, the results highlight a large potential of increased service life as well as a conflict of interest, as maximizing the service life comes at the cost of increased energy consumption. Thus, the combined optimization of energy consumption and service life indicates the importance of considering both criteria in order to contribute to the overall resource efficiency of the system.

[1]  A. Yamadal,et al.  Reliability Improvement of Industrial Robots by Optimizing Operation Plans Based on Deterioration Evaluation , 2015 .

[2]  Lelai Zhou,et al.  A New Approach to Design of a Lightweight Anthropomorphic Arm for Service Applications , 2015 .

[3]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  CHOMP: Covariant Hamiltonian optimization for motion planning , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  H. Bock,et al.  A Multiple Shooting Algorithm for Direct Solution of Optimal Control Problems , 1984 .

[5]  Maxime Gautier,et al.  Dynamic identification of the Kuka LWR robot using motor torques and joint torque sensors data , 2014 .

[6]  Premysl Sucha,et al.  Energy Optimization of Robotic Cells , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[7]  Chao Zhang,et al.  An accelerated life test model for harmonic drives under a segmental stress history and its parameter optimization , 2015 .

[8]  Marcello Pellicciari,et al.  Energy Efficient Use of Multirobot Production Lines in the Automotive Industry: Detailed System Modeling and Optimization , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[9]  Yu Zhao,et al.  Path-constrained trajectory planning for robot service life optimization , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[10]  M. Pettersson,et al.  Application Adapted Performance Optimization for Industrial Robots , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  AREUS — Innovative hardware and software for sustainable industrial robotics , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[12]  Liselotte Schebek,et al.  Impact of Cycle Time and Payload of an Industrial Robot on Resource Efficiency , 2021, Robotics.

[13]  Manfred Schmid,et al.  LIFE TEST OF AN INDUSTRIAL STANDARD AND OF A STAINLESS STEEL HARMONIC DRIVE , 2011 .

[14]  Klaus Landzettel,et al.  DLRs dynamic actuator modules for robotic space applications , 2012 .

[15]  Debora Clever,et al.  Combined Analysis of Energy Consumption and Expected Service Life of a Robotic System , 2020, 2020 6th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering (ICMRE).

[16]  Giovanni Carabin,et al.  A Review on Energy-Saving Optimization Methods for Robotic and Automatic Systems , 2017, Robotics.

[17]  Bernd Bertsche,et al.  Reliability in Automotive and Mechanical Engineering: Determination of Component and System Reliability , 2008 .

[18]  WächterAndreas,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006 .

[19]  Moritz Diehl,et al.  CasADi: a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control , 2018, Mathematical Programming Computation.