On the Nature and Elimination of Stimulus Artifact in Nerve Signals Evoked and Recorded Using Surface Electrodes

The electrical stimulus pulse and the surface electrodes commonly used to study compound action potentials of peripheral nerves give rise to an artifact consisting of an initial spike and a longer lasting tail which often interferes with the recorded signal. The artifact has four sources: 1) the voltage gradient between the recording electordes caused by stimulus current flowing through the limb, 2) the common-mode voltage of the limb caused by current escaping through the ground electrode, 3) the capacitive coupling between the stimulating and recording leads, and 4) the high-pass filtering characteristics of the recording amplifier. This paper models these sources and presents several methodological rules for minimizing their effects. Also presented are three computer-based methods for subtracting the residual artifact from contaminated records using estimates of the artifact obtained from: 1) subthreshold stimulation, 2) a second recording site remote from the nerve, or 3) stimulation during the refractory period of the nerve.

[1]  J. M. M. Neilson.  An investigation of methods of recording the electrical activity of the nervous system, with particular reference to the occurrence and suppression of stimulus artefact , 1962 .

[2]  R. Willison,et al.  The refractory and supernormal periods of the human median nerve , 1963, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  D. Robinson,et al.  The electrical properties of metal microelectrodes , 1968 .

[4]  D. Luenberger.  Optimization by Vector Space Methods , 1968 .

[5]  D B Geselowitz,et al.  Nonlinearity of cardiac pacemaker electrodes. , 1969, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[6]  J. A. Freeman.  An electronic stimulus artifact suppressor. , 1971, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  H. Elden,et al.  Biophysical properties of the skin , 1971 .

[8]  L. Geddes.  Electrodes and the measurement of bioelectric events , 1972 .

[9]  L. A. Geddes.  Interface design for bioelectrode systems , 1972, IEEE Spectrum.

[10]  R J Roby,et al.  A simplified circuit for stimulus artifact suppression. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Anthony M. Dymond,et al.  Characteristics of the Metal-Tissue Interface of Stimulation Electrodes , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Zsolt László Kovács.  Estimation of the distribution of conduction velocities in intact peripheral nerves , 1977 .

[13]  T L Babb,et al.  A sample and hold amplifier system for stimulus artifact suppression. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  D. D. Walker,et al.  A fast-recovery electrode amplifier for electrophysiology. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  Brian H. Brown,et al.  Determination of the Distribution of Conduction Velocities in Human Nerve Trunks , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  D. Perkel,et al.  Nerve fiber conduction-velocity distributions. II. Estimation based on two compound action potentials. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  Conduction velocity distributions : a population approach to electrophysiology of nerve , 1981 .

[18]  Nerve conduction velocity distributions: a method for estimation based upon two compound action potentials. , 1981, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[19]  H J Spencer.  An automatic, optically isolated, biphasic constant current stimulator adapter for artefact suppression. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.